Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40449948›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

User perspectives, challenges and opportunities in the implementation of protein-to-creatinine dipstick test for proteinuria detection in Ghana: a mixed methods study.

Hannah Brown Amoakoh, Joyce L Browne, Stephanie Zobrist, Daniel Arhinful, Rosemond Owusu, Nana Kwame Asare Ampofo, Abena Odurowaa Yeboah, Patience Cofie, Emmanuel Srofenyoh, Kwame Adu-Bonsaffoh and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Hannah Brown AmoakohDepartment of Global Public Health and Bioethics, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands hamoakoh@noguchi.ug.edu.gh.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6575-428X
Joyce L BrowneDepartment of Global Public Health and Bioethics, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Stephanie ZobristDiagnostics, PATH, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Daniel ArhinfulDepartment of Epidemiology, Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5496-3289
Rosemond OwusuWest Africa Hub, PATH, Accra, Ghana.
Nana Kwame Asare AmpofoGreater Accra Regional Hospital, Ghana Health Service, Accra, Ghana.
Abena Odurowaa YeboahGreater Accra Regional Hospital, Ghana Health Service, Accra, Ghana.
Patience CofieWest Africa Hub, PATH, Accra, Ghana.
Emmanuel SrofenyohGreater Accra Regional Hospital, Ghana Health Service, Accra, Ghana.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8934-1896
Kwame Adu-BonsaffohDepartment of Global Public Health and Bioethics, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Linda Lucy YevooDepartment of Epidemiology, Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Francis Vinkpenubar WuobarEastern Regional Hospital, Ghana Health Service Council, Accra, Ghana.
Mutsumi MetzlerMedical Devices and Health Technologies, PATH, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Patricia S CoffeyMedical Devices and Health Technologies, PATH, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8961-0910

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the appropriateness, acceptability and feasibility of implementing the Test-it PrCr Urinalysis Dipstick Test (LifeAssay Diagnostics, South Africa) in referral hospitals in Ghana.

participants96 healthcare professionals were trained on the protein-to-creatinine (PrCr) test, which was integrated into protocols alongside standard-of-care tests between November 2021 and April 2022. Test users completed questionnaires post training. Three focus group discussions (FGDs) and seven key informant interviews were conducted to evaluate test procedure comprehension, insights into training effectiveness, usability/user confidence, perceptions, attitudes towards the test and barriers and facilitators of use.

resultsHigh product usability, user confidence and satisfaction were reported. Staff perceived the test as easy to use and similar to current products. Misinterpretations of test results were less likely for strong results. Facilitators of use included effective trainings, sensitisation of the product and key stakeholder endorsement. Challenges impacting implementation feasibility included the short shelf life of test strips (3 months) after opening cannisters, the added complexity of the ratiometric result interpretation and the test's lack of other parameters that are included in current products (eg, glucose, nitrate), limiting its broader clinical utility for antenatal care screening. All FGD participants agreed that the use of the PrCr test would not change current practices/protocols for dipstick use.

conclusionAlthough the Test-It PrCr test is easy to use and well accepted, key product attributes limit its implementation feasibility in this setting. It may be more appropriate for monitoring high-risk women in this context.

Indexed as

CreatinineProteinuriaUrinalysisAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFeasibility StudiesFemaleFocus GroupsGhanaHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedReagent StripsSurveys and QuestionnairesCreatinineReagent StripsBlood PressureOBSTETRICSPregnant WomenQUALITATIVE RESEARCHQuality Improvement

Identifiers

PMID40449948
PMCPMC12142066

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.