ArticleScientific reports2025
Integrating bulk RNA-seq and scRNA-seq analyses with machine learning to predict platinum response and prognosis in ovarian cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- TFPI2 in tumor metastasis: a double-edged sword with clinical implications.Cancer biology & therapy · 2026Review
- Integrating single-cell RNA sequencing with multi-omics to decode disease microenvironments.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Comprehensive analysis of metabolic reprogramming-related gene signatures for predicting ovarian cancer prognosis, the immune landscape, and potential treatment options.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in ovarian cancer: transforming detection, treatment, and prevention.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in ovarian cancer prevention and control: a brief review of detection, treatment, and equity (2021-2026).Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Comprehensive analysis of mitochondria-associated genes in glioblastoma via single-cell and bulk RNA sequencing.Discover oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Platinum-based therapy is an integral part of the standard treatment for ovarian cancer. However, despite extensive research spanning several decades, the identification of dependable predictive biomarkers for platinum response in clinical practice has proven to be a formidable challenge. Recently, the development of single-cell technology has enabled more precise investigations into the heterogeneity of cancer. In this study, we isolated cancer cells from the single-cell transcriptomic data of platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant patients with ovarian cancer. Differential gene analysis of platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant cancer cells revealed that several of the differentially expressed genes had previously been reported in other studies to be associated with platinum resistant. Gene set enrichment analysis revealed the up-regulation of pathways involved in processes such as autophagy, cell cycle regulation, and DNA damage repair, which are known to promote platinum resistance in ovarian cancer. Based on these findings, we hypothesized that these differentially expressed genes could be used to predict the response of ovarian cancer patients to platinum-based chemotherapy. To validate this hypothesis, we explored 7 different machine learning models for predicting platinum chemotherapy response at varying feature gene counts. Ultimately, the random forest model performed the best, with 5 genes (PAX2, TFPI2, APOA1, ADIRF and CRISP3) and achieve an AUC of 0.993 in test cohort and 0.989 in GSE63885 independent validation cohorts. We named this model GPPS (Genes to Predict Platinum response Signature). Furthermore, we discovered that the GPPS model can also predict patient prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.