Observational studyBMC oral health2025
Finite element analysis of SED and facial morphology.
Observational study in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this was to construct finite element (FE) models based on computed tomography (CT) data of individual patients during orthodontic treatment and to evaluate the relationship between strain energy density (SED) in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc and the facial morphology of three skeletal patterns (Class 1-3) by cephalometric analysis.
methodsCephalometric analyses were performed on 53 patients. FE models based on the CT images of each patient were constructed, and the mean SED in the bilateral TMJ disc was calculated. The relationships between SED and the cephalometric parameters were evaluated.
resultsSED was significantly greater in Classes 1 and 2 than in Class 3 (p < 0.05). Positive correlations were observed between SED and convexity, ANB angle (p < 0.01), and gonial angle in Class 1 (p < 0.05). A negative correlation was observed between SED and facial angle in Class 3 (p < 0.05). Overall, correlations were found between SED and facial angle, convexity, mandibular angle, Y-axis, SNB, ANB angle, and overjet (p < 0.05).
conclusionIncreased SED in the TMJ disc was associated with clockwise mandibular rotation and superior posterior positioning. Mandibular morphology primarily affected SED, with facial angle, convexity, and ANB being useful predictors of TMJ dysfunction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.