ArticleBMC public health2025
Assessing the damage: analyzing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on accelerometer-assessed 24-hour movement behaviours in Brazilian adolescents.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative effectiveness of school-based physical activity interventions on moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in children and adolescents: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMC public health · 2026Pooled it
- Effect of a school-based multicomponent intervention on time-segmented physical activity and sedentary behavior among adolescents: a cluster randomized control trial.BMC public health · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough there is consistent evidence of unhealthy changes in the 24-h movement behaviours when comparing pre-COVID-19 periods to the early stages of the pandemic, there is limited research on long-term changes among adolescents. This study aimed to analyze both between- and within-participant differences in accelerometer-assessed 24-h movement behaviours by comparing cross-sectional and prospective data from the pre-COVID-19 period (August to December 2019) to the period following the reopening of schools for in-person classes in southern Brazil (August to December 2022).
methodsThis is a repeated cross-sectional design with a nested cohort. The 24-h movement behaviours (i.e., light physical activity [LIPA] and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity [MVPA], sedentary behaviour [SB], and sleep time [SPT]) were assessed by processing raw accelerometer data derived from a 24-h/7-day wrist-worn protocol. Compositional multilevel models were applied to compare the 24-h movement behaviour composition between time points for both cross-sectional and prospective data. Self-reported sociodemographic characteristics were examined as potential moderators.
resultsThe cross-sectional and prospective samples comprised, respectively, 1276 (53% female, average age of 16.4 ± 1.1) and 249 (53% female, average age of 15.6 ± 0.8) participants. The 24-h movement behaviour composition differed between time-points in the cross-sectional (p < 0.001) and prospective samples (p < 0.001). Differences from 2019 to 2022 were explained by lower MVPA (-3.3 and -5.4 min/day in cross-sectional and prospective analysis, respectively) and a higher SB (4.7 and 34 min/day in cross-sectional and prospective analysis, respectively). No significant differences were observed for LIPA and SPT.
conclusionsDifferences in the 24-h movement behaviour composition comparing the cross-sectional samples, although statistically significant, were considered trivial and unlikely to have a substantial practical impact. However, considerable differences were observed in the prospective analysis. The results suggest that most of the observed changes over time were expected as a natural consequence of aging during high school, with only a small portion attributable to the residual impact of the pandemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.