Trial reportLupus science & medicine2025
Deucravacitinib, an oral, selective, allosteric, tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, in patients with active SLE: efficacy on patient-reported outcomes in a phase II randomised trial.
Trial report in Lupus science & medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03252587 (A Phase 2 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of BMS-986165 in Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 2 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of BMS-986165 in Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systemic Treatment Strategies for Patients with Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis in the Setting of ANA Positivity or Lupus Spectrum Disease: A Comprehensive Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Advancing Care in Lupus Nephritis: Expert Perspectives on Current Practices and Future Directions in Italy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- From Convenience to Clinical Efficacy: Selective TYK2 Inhibition in Psoriasis and the Evolving Role of Next-Generation Oral Targeted Therapies.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Targeting STAT3 in systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis: mechanisms, therapeutic advances, and structure-informed perspectives.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Deucravacitinib in dermatology: current indication and existing off-label data.Drugs in context · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIn PAISLEY, a 48-week, phase II, randomised controlled trial that assessed deucravacitinib in patients with active SLE, all primary and secondary endpoints were met with the deucravacitinib 3 mg two times per day dose. Changes in patient-reported outcomes, collected as exploratory endpoints, were evaluated in this study.
methodsPatients with SLE (n=363) were randomised to placebo (n=90) or deucravacitinib 3 mg two times per day (n=91), 6 mg two times per day (n=93) or 12 mg once daily (n=89). Patients assessed pain levels on a Numeric Rating Scale and completed the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Fatigue Short Form 7a and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) at scheduled intervals. These outcomes were stratified by Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) and British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) response. Missing data were imputed using control-based pattern imputation.
resultsAt week 48, greater mean improvement in pain and fatigue scores from day 1 were reported across all deucravacitinib dose groups compared with placebo. Regardless of treatment group, SRI-4 and BICLA responders reported greater improvements in pain and fatigue than non-responders at week 48. Additionally, deucravacitinib-treated patients generally saw greater SRI-4 and BICLA response rates than placebo-treated patients. Pain decreased by 1.3 points vs 2.2-2.3 points and fatigue scores decreased by 3.4 points vs 5.9-7.3 points in the placebo versus deucravacitinib dose groups, respectively. Mean SF-36 physical scores were 41.5 vs ≥44.6 and mean SF-36 mental scores were 45.2 vs ≥46.3 with placebo versus deucravacitinib dose groups, respectively. A greater proportion of patients receiving deucravacitinib also reported clinically meaningful improvements in SF-36 scores compared with placebo.
conclusionPatients with SLE experienced greater improvements in pain, fatigue and health-related quality-of-life scores at week 48 with deucravacitinib versus placebo treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03252587.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.