ReviewJournal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis2025
Assessments of Atherosclerosis and Treatment Strategies for Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia.
Review in Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- It's Time to Measure Lp(a): Recognizing a Neglected Cardiovascular Risk.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2026Article
- Decoding Primary Hyperlipoproteinemias: A Focus on the Pathogenesis and Diagnosis of Familial Hypercholesterolemia and Familial Combined Hyperlipidemia.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) carry an extremely elevated cardiovascular risk because of lifelong exposure to elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). The Japan Atherosclerosis Society (JAS) complies with the clinical guidelines of FH stipulating diagnostic criteria as well as the treatment targets based on their cardiovascular preventive status. These guidelines are expected to improve the FH diagnosis rate and facilitate better LDL-C management, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes. However, there are no clear instructions on how and when to assess atherosclerosis. In addition, current treatment target goals, especially for adults with heterozygous FH (HeFH) (LDL-C <100 mg/dL in primary prevention and LDL-C <70 mg/dL in secondary prevention), are sometimes insufficient to fully navigate to prevent cardiovascular events, given that many factors, such as hypertension, diabetes, smoking, lipoprotein (a), cholesterol-year score, coronary artery calcium, and pathogenic mutations are associated with a further increased risk on top of the LDL-C level assessed cross-sectionally. Accordingly, we summarized contemporary strategies for assessing systemic atherosclerosis and treatment options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.