ArticleJournal of community health2025
Evaluation of a Whole Food, Plant-Based Nutrition Intervention Program for Black Leaders in Brooklyn, NY.
Article in Journal of community health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Whole food plant-based (WFPB) nutrition supports prevention and management of cardiometabolic disease. Greater intake of whole plant foods may lower chronic disease burden in high-risk communities. Exposing community leaders to the benefits of WFPB nutrition may lead them to recommend it to constituents. The intervention consisted of online live classes and peer mentorship. Participants strove to adopt an ad-libitum WFPB diet without added oil and with minimal sugar and salt for 21 days. The program was assessed in a focus group, and with pre/post-program surveys measuring nutrition knowledge, health-related QOL, dietary intake, and mental health. Program-related changes in outcomes were measured using paired t-tests or McNemar's tests. Qualitative data evaluation used inductive methods. Of the 26 participants who agreed to participate, 13 (62%) completed the program. All were Black female community leaders with average age of 59.2±13.1 years. Most (84.6%) reported ≥ 1 chronic disease. Statistically significant program-related improvements were found in nutrition knowledge, BMI, energy levels and mental clarity. Other changes did not reach statistical significance. Most (92%) said they would recommend the program to others. Participants identified high quality educational content and peer mentorship as program strengths. Potential barriers to future community participation included inconsistent healthcare provider support of WFPB nutrition, the perception that WFPB nutrition is expensive/lacks variety, and difficulty giving up meat due to cultural traditions. This pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of conducting an online WFPB dietary intervention for this population. The data collected will inform a planned expanded study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40451990What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.