SynthesisJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2025
Patient-centered insights into virtual reality rehabilitation for stroke: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis.
Synthesis in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The effectiveness of virtual reality/motion-sensing games incorporating swing-based elements on upper limb function after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Trial
- User Experience of Extended Reality Treatment for Visuospatial Neglect Among Patients and Informal Caregivers: Qualitative Interview Study.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2026Article
- Comparing the Effect of Semi-Immersive Virtual Reality, Computerized Cognitive Training, and Traditional Rehabilitation on Cognitive Function in Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026Article
- Digital and Intelligent Rehabilitation Technologies in Stroke and Neurological Disorders: A Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence, Virtual Reality, Gamification, and Emerging Therapeutic Platforms in Neurorehabilitation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVirtual reality rehabilitation (VRR) is an emerging technology that offers new possibilities for stroke recovery. Understanding stroke survivors' experiences and expectations is essential for optimizing its application.
objectiveThis systematic review synthesizes qualitative evidence on stroke survivors' experiences with and participation in VRR to identify benefits, challenges, and areas for improvement.
methodsThis systematic review follows the meta-aggregation method guided by ENTREQ and PRISMA and uses the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) to assess the quality of included studies. We searched eight English and Chinese databases for qualitative or mixed-method studies on stroke survivors' experiences with VRR, published by May 31, 2024. Selected studies were independently reviewed, and data were synthesized into core themes.
resultsFourteen studies were included, involving a total of 133 participants aged 13 to 85 years. The analysis identified four key themes: (1) perceived self-benefits, including physical and psychological improvements; (2) facilitators, such as user engagement and supportive environments; (3) barriers, including technical and personal limitations; and (4) expectations.The quality of the included studies was assessed using the CASP tool, with scores ranging from 26 to 30, indicating moderate to high quality across the studies.
conclusionVRR has the potential to enhance stroke rehabilitation outcomes, but its success depends on addressing individual and systemic challenges. Personalized interventions and multidisciplinary efforts are needed to develop user-friendly, adaptable VRR systems that fully leverage the advantages of this technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.