ReviewCureus2025
The Use of Bone Marrow Transplantation (BMT) or Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) in Pediatric Patients Diagnosed With Ataxia-Telangiectasia: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Cell-Based Therapies for Spinocerebellar Degenerations: A Systematic Review of Human Clinical Evidence.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026Pooled it
- Systematic review of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with ataxia telangiectasia: a case report and an individual patient-level analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Ataxia-Telangiectasia, DNA Repair Deficits, Immune Dysfunction, and Cancer: A Review of Mechanisms, Clinical Presentations, and Emerging Therapies.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2026Review
- Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Based Therapy for Cerebellar Ataxia: From Bench to Bedside.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ataxia-telangiectasia (A-T) is a rare neurological disorder that leads to early death due to immunodeficiency, leukemia, and lymphoma. Given the underlying immune dysfunction and predisposition to hematologic cancers, bone marrow transplantation (BMT) or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has emerged as a potential therapeutic strategy in pediatric patients with A-T. Therefore, longer follow-ups are needed to assess associated risks, side effects, procedures, and eligibility criteria. This systematic review aims to fill this gap by consolidating evidence from different parts of the world on the use of HSCT in pediatric patients diagnosed with A-T. The study used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to search five databases (PubMed, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, and MEDLINE) for relevant published papers. The review covered studies on both classical and variant forms of A-T. The studies included are those with primary outcomes related to engraftment success, immunological reconstitution, survival rates, transplant-associated toxicity, infection prevalence, cancer management, and neurological progression. Only papers published in English between 2010 and 2024 were eligible for inclusion. Two experienced researchers independently assessed the retrieved papers for inclusion. A structured data collection sheet was used to retrieve relevant information from the selected articles. The risk of bias of the items included prospective and retrospective, cross-sectional, and cohort studies was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. Eight studies were included, comprising various designs including prospective, retrospective, and population-based cohorts. Among these, three studies reported actual use of HSCT or BMT in pediatric patients with A-T, showing immune reconstitution and reduced infections, but limited impact on neurological decline. Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) was associated with better survival and fewer complications compared to myeloablative regimens. The remaining studies discussed HSCT theoretically or focused on supportive care, immunological profiles, cancer risk, or nutritional challenges. Overall, outcomes varied, with limited evidence supporting routine use of HSCT in A-T due to associated risks and uncertain long-term benefits. In conclusion, HSCT shows potential in improving immune function and reducing infections in A-T patients. However, it has minimal effect on halting neurological progression. Given the risks and limited long-term data, HSCT is not currently recommended as a standard treatment for A-T.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.