ArticleCureus2025
Strategic Care of Ballistic Injuries: A Retrospective Observational Study at a Moroccan Military Hospital.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Ballistic trauma from high-velocity projectiles causes severe multisystem injury and rapid physiological decline. While well-characterized in combat and civilian violence, accidental firearm injuries during military training remain understudied. These incidents typically affect young, unprotected individuals in settings with limited prehospital care factors that may influence injury patterns and outcomes. This study aims to describe the clinical features, injury profiles, and management of accidental ballistic trauma in a military training context, with implications for prevention, triage, and critical care in resource-limited settings. Methods We conducted a six-year retrospective observational study (2016-2021) at Hassan II Military Hospital, Morocco, including 32 consecutive male patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for accidental high-velocity ballistic trauma sustained during military training. Injuries were caused by North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)-standard live ammunition (5.56 × 45 mm or 7.62 × 51 mm). No exclusions were applied. Data collected included demographics, injury characteristics, prehospital care, hemodynamic parameters at admission, surgeries, and outcomes. ICU admission followed institutional protocols based on hemodynamic instability, high trauma burden, or need for invasive support. Outcomes were classified as favorable (ICU discharge without major complications) or unfavorable (mortality, organ failure, or reoperation). The study received ethics approval from the Institutional Committee of Hassan II Military Hospital. Results The mean age was 30.7 years; half of the patients were aged 31-40. Multiregional injuries were frequent: limb trauma (50%), abdominal injury (37.5%), and neurological impairment (Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS): 9-13 in 37.5%). On ICU admission, tachypnea (62.5%), tachycardia (50%), and hypotension (37.5%) were common. Most patients (87.5%) underwent surgery (60% orthopedic and 40% abdominal), with a mean delay of 13.2 ± 7.3 hours, mainly due to prehospital transfer and imaging delays. Intensive monitoring was required in 62.5%. Injury Severity Score (ISS) ranged from 12 to 32, indicating moderate-to-severe trauma in over one-third of patients. Favorable outcomes were observed in 62.5%. Unfavorable outcomes (37.5%), including mortality and reoperation, were significantly associated with older age, comorbidities, hypotension, mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 65 mmHg, and oliguria (p < 0.05). Conclusion Accidental ballistic trauma during military training is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, particularly when early hemodynamic instability is present. Findings support early triage, aggressive resuscitation, and application of damage control principles at the point of injury ("damage control at ground zero") as critical strategies. Although limited by its retrospective, single-center design and small sample, this study provides foundational evidence to guide trauma protocols and improve care delivery in resource-limited military environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.