ReviewCureus2025
Neuropharmacology of Ketamine and Its Use in the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder: A Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Psychoactive and Neurobiological Effects of Ketamine in Humans: A Scoping Review of Clinical Evidence.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Depression is a common yet potentially debilitating mood disorder with complex neurobiological underpinnings, including deficiencies in monoaminergic and glutamatergic signaling, overactivity of the lateral habenula, and dysregulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) signaling. Ketamine has emerged as a mechanistically novel, effective, and rapidly acting antidepressant. Ketamine's primary effects are due to N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) antagonism, although hypotheses regarding the importance of its impact on monoaminergic signaling (preclinical evidence), BDNF signaling (preclinical evidence), opioid receptor agonism (preclinical evidence), and neuroinflammation (clinical evidence) have gained traction. Compared to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), ketamine demonstrates greater efficacy, a significantly faster onset of action, and generally more tolerable side effects. However, its benefits are offset by a far shorter duration of antidepressant effects and accessibility limitations. In a head-to-head trial, compared to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), ketamine showed similar efficacy in non-psychotic depression while providing clinically significant relief more rapidly. While promising, further research is needed to optimize ketamine's dosing regimen, enhance its accessibility, and better understand potential drawbacks such as bladder toxicity and addiction potential. Additionally, studying the mechanisms behind ketamine's antidepressant action may provide deeper insight into the neurobiology of depression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.