ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Potential categories of perceived recurrence risk in stroke patients and their relationship with self-management ability.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to identify latent profile categories of recurrence risk perception among stroke patients, analyze the factors influencing these categories, and examine their correlation with self-management ability. The findings are intended to provide new insights and a foundation for enhancing self-management in stroke patients. Methods: A total of 221 stroke patients admitted to the Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery at Xuzhou Central Hospital between January 2024 and December 2024 were selected using a convenience sampling method. Data were collected using a general information questionnaire, the Stroke Patient Recurrence Risk Perception Assessment Scale, and the Stroke Patient Self-Management Ability Assessment Scale. Statistical analyses included factor analysis and pairwise comparisons to examine influencing factors and their relationships. Results: A total of 221 questionnaires were distributed, with 23 invalid responses excluded, yielding an effective response rate of 89.59%. The mean recurrence risk perception score was 39.63 ± 5.67, while the mean self-management ability score was 85.69 ± 12.33. Latent profile analysis identified three distinct categories of recurrence risk perception: high -level, medium -level, and low -level risk perception groups. Univariate analysis revealed significant differences in recurrence risk perception based on age ( Conclusion: This study utilized latent profile analysis to classify stroke patients' recurrence risk perception into three categories: high, medium, and low. These profiles were influenced by age, living environment, disease duration, and stroke frequency. Moreover, recurrence risk perception was significantly associated with self-management ability. Clinical practitioners should focus on patients in the low -level risk perception group, implementing targeted interventions to enhance their awareness of recurrence risk, thereby improving self-management, preventing recurrence, and optimizing patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.