Trial reportClinical interventions in aging2025
Intervening on Calorie Intake or Eating Timing in Older Adults: Lessons Learned in the Healthy Aging and Late-Life Outcomes Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.
Trial report in Clinical interventions in aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Caloric restriction and time-restricted eating in older adults with overweight or obesity: The Health, Aging, and Later-Life Outcomes Pilot Study.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2026Trial
- Effects of Diet Strategy and Nutrients on the Progression and Prevention of Diabetic Cardiomyopathy: A Narrative Review.Food science & nutrition · 2026Review
- Does time spent upright moderate the influence of a weighted vest on change in bone mineral density during weight loss among older adults? A secondary analysis of the INVEST in bone health randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in aging · 2026Article
- A mobile intervention to reduce pain and improve health-III: protocol for a remotely delivered randomized controlled trial of physical activity for pain management in older adults with obesity and knee or hip osteoarthritis.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- The Health, Aging, and Later-Life Outcomes Pilot Study: Design, recruitment, and participants' baseline characteristics.Contemporary clinical trials · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: The Healthy Aging and Late Life Outcomes Pilot (HALLO-P) trial was designed to pilot in-person and remotely delivered caloric restriction (CR and RCR respectively) and time restricted eating (TRE) in preparation for a long-term multi-site clinical trial. Herein, we describe the development and execution of these behavioral interventions with a focus on lessons learned and post-study questionnaire data. Patients and Methods: Participants were community-dwelling older (60+ yrs) adults with obesity or overweight with an indication for weight loss. Participants were randomized to 9 months of group-based CR, RCR, or TRE supported by self-monitoring technologies [ie, a tablet application paired with an activity monitor (all) and wireless scale (CR and RCR)]. Intervention staff recorded attendance at sessions and noted intervention-related lessons learned as they arose. Upon completion of the study period, participants were asked to complete a series of Likert-type and open-ended questions related to their experiences in the trial. Results: Participants (N = 90; 67.19 ± 4.91 years) attended 84.4% of sessions on average, engaged with study technologies 96.4% of days, and provided daily weights on >4 days per week across the study (CR and RCR only). Participants reported high satisfaction with the program, with RCR participants being significantly more likely than TRE participants to report being satisfied with their program overall (100% vs 75%, p < 0.01), intending to continue their dietary change post-intervention (97% vs 63%, p < 0.01), and being willing to sustain their dietary approach and engage with study technologies over a 5-year period (88% vs 61%, p < 0.01). Open-ended feedback underscored the value of the group-based structure of the program and remote delivery to reduce travel burden, the need for reduced burden associated with food logging, and the need to identify methods for enhancing perceived value of TRE among older adults. Conclusion: An intervention designed to promote CR, primarily delivered remotely and supported by self-monitoring technology, is both feasible and acceptable to many older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.