ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2025
Comparative analysis of endophytic bacterial localization and microbiome diversity in plant varieties under varied growth conditions through microscopic imaging and sequencing techniques.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Intracellular colonization by endophytic bacteria (EB) is a relatively new and less explored aspect of plant microbiome research. In this study, we investigated the presence and localization of EB in Methodology: Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM) was used to visualized bacterial localization, MitoTracker Deep Red (MDR) was used to confirm non- overlapping mitochondrial staining. Time-lapse imaging was employed to observe bacterial motility. For microbial community profiling next-generation sequencing (NGS) of the 16S rRNA gene was conducted to analyze bacterial diversity and composition. Results: Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) revealed S9-labelled live bacteria located close to the nucleus in Podali tissues and suspension cultures, while PI selectively stained dead cells. MitoTracker Deep Red (MDR) confirmed that there was no overlap with mitochondrial staining. Interestingly, time-lapse imaging captured the movement of bacteria within the cells, indicating possible bacterial motility. EB were observed in both in vitro and field-grown Podali plants, whereas they were detected only in field-grown Pratap plants. Next-generation sequencing revealed that Podali harbored a much higher bacterial diversity, with 37 bacterial families identified mainly from Conclusion: This study is among the first to report intracellular EB localization in these plant varieties and demonstrates how environmental conditions and growth methods can influence the composition of plant-associated microbiomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.