Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2025
Overall Survival with Inavolisib in
Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 60 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Inavolisib Plus Palbociclib and Fulvestrant Versus Placebo Plus Palbociclib and Fulvestrant in Patients With PIK3CA-Mutant, Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer
A Real-World Study of Inavolisib in Patients With HR-Positive/HER2-Negative, PIK3CA-Mutated Advanced Breast Cancer
Who cites it
60 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A Systematic Review of Major Advances in Breast Cancer Therapeutics in 2025: Synthesis of Conference and Published Evidence.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Guidance for Canadian Breast Cancer Practice: National Consensus Recommendations for the Systemic Treatment of Patients with HR+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer 2025.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Guideline
- Trial
- Trial
- Targeting the Chromatin-Modifying Enzyme, KDM5C, Enhances AKT Inhibition Response in ER+ Breast Cancer.Molecular cancer therapeutics · 2026Article
- Toward targeted therapeutics for lobular breast cancer.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026Review
- CNS distribution and preclinical activity of the PI3K/AKT inhibitors inavolisib and ipatasertib in pediatric-type diffuse high-grade gliomas.Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2026Article
- The logarithmic phase as a therapeutic direction: evaluating pharmacological strategies against cancer progression.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Review
- Emerging Strategies Targeting the PI3K/AKT/mTOR Pathway in HR+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer.Drugs · 2026Review
- Review
- Top advances of the year: Breast cancer.Cancer · 2026Article
- Clinical Advances in Breast Cancer: A Comprehensive Overview of Full-Course Disease Management.Cancer innovation · 2026Review
- New perspectives on endocrine therapy suitability for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer in clinical practice.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2026Review
- Evolving First-Line Endocrine Therapy in HR+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer: CDK4/6 Inhibition, Biomarker-Guided Strategies and Emerging Therapeutic Paradigms.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
- GenoGlyph: Pan-cancer genomic mutation inference and risk stratification from diagnostic histopathology slides.Research square · 2026Article
- Navigating first- and second-line treatment options in hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative advanced breast cancer.The oncologist · 2026Review
- 2025 Update of the Taiwan Expert Consensus on Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Management.Journal of breast cancer · 2026Review
- The Current Landscape of Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Pathology Guide on Emerging Biomarkers.Cancers · 2026Review
- Comprehensive molecular characterization identifies therapeutic vulnerabilities in ovarian clear cell carcinoma.Genome medicine · 2026Article
- Identifying research gaps in PIK3CA-mutant breast cancer: a bibliometric analysis of evolving trends and clinical applications.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn the phase 3, double-blind, randomized INAVO120 trial, treatment with inavolisib plus palbociclib-fulvestrant led to a significant progression-free survival benefit, as compared with placebo plus palbociclib-fulvestrant, among patients with
methodsWe randomly assigned patients with
resultsA total of 161 patients were assigned to the inavolisib group, and 164 to the placebo group. After a median follow-up of 34.2 months in the inavolisib group and 32.3 months in the placebo group, the median overall survival was 34.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 28.4 to 44.8) with inavolisib and 27.0 months (95% CI, 22.8 to 38.7) with placebo (hazard ratio for death, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.94; P = 0.02 [prespecified boundary for statistical significance, P<0.0469]). An objective response occurred in 62.7% (95% CI, 54.8 to 70.2) of patients in the inavolisib group and 28.0% (95% CI, 21.3 to 35.6) of those in the placebo group (P<0.001). The updated hazard ratio for disease progression or death was 0.42 (95% CI, 0.32 to 0.55). Adverse events led to discontinuation of inavolisib in 6.8% of patients and discontinuation of placebo in 0.6%. The incidence of hyperglycemia, stomatitis or mucosal inflammation, gastrointestinal toxic effects (e.g., diarrhea), and ocular toxic effects (e.g., dry eye and blurred vision) was higher with inavolisib than with placebo.
conclusionsTreatment with inavolisib plus palbociclib-fulvestrant led to a significant overall survival benefit, as compared with placebo plus palbociclib-fulvestrant. Hyperglycemia, stomatitis or mucosal inflammation, gastrointestinal toxic effects, and ocular toxic effects were reported more frequently with inavolisib than with placebo. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche; INAVO120 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04191499.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.