Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40454641›Full record

Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2025

Overall Survival with Inavolisib in

Komal L Jhaveri, Seock-Ah Im, Cristina Saura, Sibylle Loibl, Kevin Kalinsky, Peter Schmid, Sherene Loi, Eirini Thanopoulou, Noopur Shankar, Yanling Jin and 5 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 60 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04191499 phase2 / phase3active not recruitingnot on this map

A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Inavolisib Plus Palbociclib and Fulvestrant Versus Placebo Plus Palbociclib and Fulvestrant in Patients With PIK3CA-Mutant, Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorHoffmann-La RocheRan2020 to 2027Enrolled325ConditionsBreast CancerArmsInavolisib, Placebo, Palbociclib, Fulvestrant
NCT07543250 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

A Real-World Study of Inavolisib in Patients With HR-Positive/HER2-Negative, PIK3CA-Mutated Advanced Breast Cancer

TypeobservationalSponsorxuliangRan2026 to 2027Enrolled100ConditionsBreast CancerArmsInavolisib in Combination With ET, Inavolisib in Combination With ET+CDK4/6i
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Toward targeted therapeutics for lobular breast cancer.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. The logarithmic phase as a therapeutic direction: evaluating pharmacological strategies against cancer progression.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. The journal of liquid biopsy · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Komal L JhaveriBreast and Early Drug Development Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York.
Seock-Ah ImSeoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
Cristina SauraVall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona.
Sibylle LoiblGerman Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Frankfurt, Germany.
Kevin KalinskyWinship Cancer Institute at Emory University, Atlanta.
Peter SchmidCentre for Experimental Cancer Medicine, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London.
Sherene LoiDivision of Cancer Research and Clinical Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Eirini ThanopoulouRoche, Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom.
Noopur ShankarGenentech, San Francisco.
Yanling JinHoffmann-La Roche, Mississauga, ON, Canada.
Thomas J StoutGenentech, San Francisco.
Tiffany D ClarkGenentech, San Francisco.
Chunyan SongGenentech, San Francisco.
Dejan JuricMass General Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Nicholas C TurnerRoyal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748Roche NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the phase 3, double-blind, randomized INAVO120 trial, treatment with inavolisib plus palbociclib-fulvestrant led to a significant progression-free survival benefit, as compared with placebo plus palbociclib-fulvestrant, among patients with

methodsWe randomly assigned patients with

resultsA total of 161 patients were assigned to the inavolisib group, and 164 to the placebo group. After a median follow-up of 34.2 months in the inavolisib group and 32.3 months in the placebo group, the median overall survival was 34.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 28.4 to 44.8) with inavolisib and 27.0 months (95% CI, 22.8 to 38.7) with placebo (hazard ratio for death, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.94; P = 0.02 [prespecified boundary for statistical significance, P<0.0469]). An objective response occurred in 62.7% (95% CI, 54.8 to 70.2) of patients in the inavolisib group and 28.0% (95% CI, 21.3 to 35.6) of those in the placebo group (P<0.001). The updated hazard ratio for disease progression or death was 0.42 (95% CI, 0.32 to 0.55). Adverse events led to discontinuation of inavolisib in 6.8% of patients and discontinuation of placebo in 0.6%. The incidence of hyperglycemia, stomatitis or mucosal inflammation, gastrointestinal toxic effects (e.g., diarrhea), and ocular toxic effects (e.g., dry eye and blurred vision) was higher with inavolisib than with placebo.

conclusionsTreatment with inavolisib plus palbociclib-fulvestrant led to a significant overall survival benefit, as compared with placebo plus palbociclib-fulvestrant. Hyperglycemia, stomatitis or mucosal inflammation, gastrointestinal toxic effects, and ocular toxic effects were reported more frequently with inavolisib than with placebo. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche; INAVO120 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04191499.).

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsBreast Neoplasms, MaleClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPhosphoinositide-3 Kinase InhibitorsAdultAgedDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFulvestrantHumansImidazolesKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesFulvestrantImidazolesinavolisibOxazolespalbociclibPhosphoinositide-3 Kinase InhibitorsPIK3CA protein, humanPiperazinesPyridines

Identifiers

PMID40454641
PMCPMC13496148

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.