ArticlePloS one2025
Early detection of occupational stress: Enhancing workplace safety with machine learning and large language models.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A scoping review of the use of artificial intelligence as a psychological assessment tool.Translational psychiatry · 2026Article
- Calibrated Deep-Learning Risk Indexing and Latent Behavioural Profiling for Occupational Mental-Health Risk Assessment.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A hybrid AIoT model for workplace stress prediction and intervention using social media platforms.Discover mental health · 2026Article
- Work-Life Conditions as the Primary Determinant of Seafarer Mental Health: An Explainable Machine Learning Analysis.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
- The role of the occupational physician in the early detection of occupational diseases.Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMTReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Occupational stress is a major concern for employers and organizations as it compromises decision-making and overall safety of workers. Studies indicate that work-stress contributes to severe mental strain, increased accident rates, and in extreme cases, even suicides. This study aims to enhance early detection of occupational stress through machine learning (ML) methods, providing stakeholders with better insights into the underlying causes of stress to improve occupational safety. Utilizing a newly published workplace survey dataset, we developed a novel feature selection pipeline identifying 39 key indicators of work-stress. An ensemble of three ML models achieved a state-of-the-art accuracy of 90.32%, surpassing existing studies. The framework's generalizability was confirmed through a three-step validation technique: holdout-validation, 10-fold cross-validation, and external-validation with synthetic data generation, achieving an accuracy of 89% on unseen data. We also introduced a 1D-CNN to enable hierarchical and temporal learning from the data. Additionally, we created an algorithm to convert tabular data into texts with 100% information retention, facilitating domain analysis with large language models, revealing that occupational stress is more closely related to the biomedical domain than clinical or generalist domains. Ablation studies reinforced our feature selection pipeline, and revealed sociodemographic features as the most important. Explainable AI techniques identified excessive workload and ambiguity (27%), poor communication (17%), and a positive work environment (16%) as key stress factors. Unlike previous studies relying on clinical settings or biomarkers, our approach streamlines stress detection from simple survey questions, offering a real-time, deployable tool for periodic stress assessment in workplaces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.