ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2025
A trajectory-informed model for detecting drug-drug-host interaction from real-world data.
Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveAdverse drug event (ADE) is a significant challenge to public health. Since data mining methods have been developed to identify signals of drug-drug interaction-induced (DDI-induced) or drug-host interaction-induced (DHI-induced) ADE from real-world data, we aim to develop a new method to detect adverse drug-drug interaction with a special awareness on patient characteristics.
methodsWe developed a trajectory-informed model (TIM) to identify signals of adverse DDI with a special awareness on patient characteristics (i.e., drug-drug-host interaction [DDHI]). We also proposed a study design based on an optimal selection of within-subject and between-subjects controls for detecting ADEs from real-world data. We analyzed a large-scale US administrative claims data and conducted a simulation study.
resultsIn administrative claims data analysis, we developed optimally matched case-control datasets for potential ADEs including acute kidney injury and gastrointestinal bleeding. We identified that an optimal selection of controls had a higher AUC compared to traditional designs for ADE detection (AUCs: 0.79-0.80 vs. 0.56-0.76). We observed that TIM detected more signals than reference methods (odds ratios: 1.13-3.18, P < 0.01), and found that 36 % of all signals generated by TIM were DDHI signals. In a simulation study, we demonstrated that TIM had an empirical false discovery rate (FDR) less than the desired value of 0.05, as well as > 1.4-fold higher probabilities of detection of DDHI signals than reference methods.
conclusionsTIM had a high probability to identify signals of adverse DDI and DDHI in a high-throughput ADE mining while controlling false positive rate. A significant portion of drug-drug combinations were associated with an increased risk of ADEs only in specific patient subpopulations. Optimal selection of within-subject and between-subjects controls could improve the performance of ADE data mining.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.