Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40457312›Full record

ReviewJournal of nanobiotechnology2025

In situ radiochemical doping of functionalized inorganic nanoplatforms for theranostic applications: a paradigm shift in nanooncology.

Sanchita Ghosh, Yutong Liang, Weibo Cai, Rubel Chakravarty

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Linking In Vivo Imaging to Therapeutic Outcome withInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sanchita Ghosh *Radiopharmaceuticals Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Mumbai, 400085, India.
Yutong Liang *Michigan State University College of Osteopathic Medicine, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.
Weibo CaiDepartments of Radiology and Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, USA. wcai@uwhealth.org.
Rubel ChakravartyRadiopharmaceuticals Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Mumbai, 400085, India. rubelc@barc.gov.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In situ radiochemical doping presents a transformative approach for synthesizing radiolabeled inorganic nanoparticles (NPs) for cancer theranostics. Traditional radiolabeling techniques rely on bifunctional chelators, which often require harsh reaction conditions that can degrade the physicochemical properties of NPs. Additionally, the enzymatic dissociation of radiometals can potentially induce in vivo toxicity. In contrast, in situ doping directly incorporates radiometals into the NP crystal lattice, significantly enhancing both radiolabeling yield and radiochemical stability. This method preserves the pharmacokinetic profiles of the radiolabeled NPs, improving their theranostic efficacy. This review provides an up-to-date overview of the progress made in the development of radiolabeled inorganic nanoplatforms through in situ doping, with a focus on their stability, physicochemical characteristics, and applications in cancer theranostics. Our findings highlight the advantages in situ doping as a more efficient and stable alternative to conventional radiolabeling methods, offering substantial potential for the development of more effective cancer theranostic agents.

Indexed as

NanoparticlesNeoplasmsRadiopharmaceuticalsTheranostic NanomedicineAnimalsHumansRadioisotopesRadioisotopesRadiopharmaceuticalsCancerDopingIn situNanoparticlesPrecision oncologyRadiation therapyRadiolabelingTheranostics

Identifiers

PMID40457312
PMCPMC12128498

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.