ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
Development and validation of an interpretable nomogram for predicting the risk of the prolonged postoperative length of stay for tuberculous spondylitis: a novel approach for risk stratification.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and evaluation of a nomogram model for predicting prolonged hospitalization after spinal tuberculosis focus decompression, fusion, and internal fixation surgery.European journal of medical research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTuberculous spondylitis (TS) is a challenging health care condition requiring spine surgery, and predicting the probabilities of prolonged postoperative length of stay (PLOS) can aid in effective management, especially with the increasing number of aging patients. This study aimed to develop and validate an interpretable nomogram for risk stratification and prediction of prolonged PLOS for TS patients after surgery, utilizing SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) for model interpretation.
methodsThis retrospective analysis comprised data of 580 TS patients that were hospitalized between January 2016 and December 2022. Prolonged PLOS was defined as hospitalization exceeding the 75th percentile. Factors associated with an increased risk of prolonged PLOS were identified using the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) method and incorporated into a multivariable logistic regression model. SHAP values were generated to explain the contribution of each variable in predicting prolonged PLOS. Based on the identified risk variables, a nomogram was constructed using the SHAP values to represent each factor's contribution to the final outcome. The nomogram's effectiveness was assessed using calibration plots, discrimination analysis, and decision curve analysis.
resultsAmong 580 patients, 127 had prolonged postoperative length of stay (PLOS > 11 days), while 453 had normal stays (≤ 11 days). The developed nomogram incorporated 7 significant risk factors along with their corresponding SHAP values, which are C-reactive protein (CRP), multiple sections, CT-vertebral destruction, MRI-epidural abscess, transfusions, blood loss and postoperative drainage (Drainage volume on the first day after surgery). The calibration graphs showed that the expected and observed probability of prolonged PLOS was in close agreement. Discrimination analysis yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.867 (95% CI: 0.828-0.908) in the training set, indicating good predictive performance. Decision curve analysis confirmed the clinical utility of the nomogram in risk stratification and treatment decision-making.
conclusionsBy utilizing SHAP for model interpretation, this study provides an interpretable nomogram for assessing the possibility of extended PLOS in TS patients. The inclusion of SHAP values allows clinicians to understand the contribution of each variable in the prediction, thereby increasing transparency and aiding in the decision-making process. This nomogram has the potential to contribute to improved patient management and optimization of resource allocation. Prospective validation studies are recommended to further evaluate its effectiveness in clinical practice. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.