ArticleReproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E2025
Cumulative live births and predictive factors of emergency oocyte cryopreservation: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOocyte vitrification, a widely utilized assisted reproductive technology for fertility preservation, can address emergencies arising from the unavailability of sperm from the male partner on the day of oocyte retrieval. However, the infrequent and unpredictable nature of emergency oocyte cryopreservation leads to a scarcity of literature on its reproductive outcomes, complicating the provision of informed patient counseling.
methodsThis study, conducted between January 2017 and December 2022, included 137 emergency oocyte cryopreservation cycles involving 136 patients and their respective thawed cycles. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze cycle characteristics and oocyte thaw and transfer outcomes, grouped by indication of oocyte vitrification. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors associated with reproductive outcomes by indication of oocyte vitrification.
resultsA total of 137 emergency oocyte cryopreservation-thaw cycles were analyzed, with a median oocyte survival rate of 84.2%, fertilization rate of 57.7%, and high-quality Day-3 embryo formation rate of 33.3%. Of all cycles, 15.3% resulted in no transferable embryos. The cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) for the entire cohort was 29.2%, with 40 live births achieved through both fresh and frozen embryo transfers. Stratified analysis revealed that cycles due to absolute male factor infertility had higher reproductive efficiency, including more oocytes retrieved, a greater number of high-quality embryos, higher implantation rates, and a CLBR of 39.5%, compared to 11.8% in the relative male factor group. Multivariate analysis identified female age, infertility duration, sperm source, number of mature oocytes retrieved and the presence of male infertility factors as key determinants of live birth outcomes.
conclusionsEmergency oocyte vitrification yielded a cumulative live birth rate of 29.2%, with rates differing by clinical indication: 39.5% in the absolute male factor group and 11.8% in the relative male factor group. Moreover, the factors associated with reduced live birth rates differed depending on the underlying indication for vitrification. These findings support the clinical utility of emergency oocyte vitrification and underscore the significant contributions of both female and male factors to reproductive outcomes of oocyte cryopreservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.