Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40457540›Full record

ArticleMicrobial biotechnology2025

Exploring Use of a Protein Cage System for Producing Bioactive Peptides in Escherichia coli.

Maxim D Harding, Mark A Jackson, Edward K Gilding, Kuok Yap, David J Craik, Frank Sainsbury, Nicole Lawrence

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maxim D HardingInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Innovations in Peptide and Protein Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1698-4780
Mark A JacksonInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Innovations in Peptide and Protein Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7629-8198
Edward K GildingInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Innovations in Peptide and Protein Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Kuok YapInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Innovations in Peptide and Protein Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
David J CraikInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Innovations in Peptide and Protein Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Frank SainsburyCentre for Cell Factories and Biopolymers, Institute for Biomedicine and Glycomics, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia.
Nicole LawrenceInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Innovations in Peptide and Protein Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9013-1770

Funding

Australian Research Council CE200100012Australian Research Council CE200100029Australian Research Council FT230100084Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs PR210354National Health and Medical Research Council 2009564
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New therapeutics are urgently needed to curb the spread of drug-resistant diseases. Bioactive peptides (BAPs), including antimicrobial peptides, are emerging as an exciting new class of compounds with advantages over current drug modalities, especially small molecule drugs that are prone to resistance development. Here, we evaluated a bacteriophage P22 virus-like particle (VLP) system where BAPs are encapsulated as fusion proteins with the P22 scaffold protein (SP) within self-assembling protein cages in Escherichia coli. Representative peptides from three structurally distinct classes of BAPs were successfully encapsulated into P22 VLPs at high cargo to VLP coat protein (CP) ratios that corresponded to interactions between the compact electropositive structures of the SP-BAPs and electronegative regions on the inward facing surface of CP subunits. However, high loading densities did not correspond to improved SP-BAP yields. An unexpected finding of this study was that while encapsulation alleviated negative effects of SP-BAPs on E. coli growth, the P22 scaffold protein acted as a sufficient fusion partner for accumulating BAPs, and co-expression of the CP did not further improve SP-BAP yields. Nevertheless, encapsulation in VLPs provided a useful first step in the purification pipeline for producing both linear and cyclic recombinant (r)BAPs that were functionally equivalent to their synthetic counterparts. Further efforts to optimise expression ratios of CP to SP-BAP fusions will be required to realise the full potential of encapsulation for protecting expression hosts and maximising rBAP yields.

Indexed as

Escherichia coliPeptidesRecombinant Fusion ProteinsPeptidesRecombinant Fusion Proteinsbacteriophage P22bioactive peptideprotein encapsulationrecombinant expressionvirus‐like particle

Identifiers

PMID40457540
PMCPMC12129825

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.