ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2025
Establishing standardized healthy reference distributions and values for multisite
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Correlating Pulmonary Hemodynamics With HPMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Characterization of Pulmonary Functional Abnormalities in Systemic Sclerosis Using Xenon MRI.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Article
- Actuated dose delivery and physiological monitoring ofMagma (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Dynamic RBC-To-Membrane Ratio inMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Using hyperpolarised xenon-129 magnetic resonance imaging to investigate longitudinal effects of long COVID on pulmonary function.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- Combining hyperpolarizedJournal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo establish standardized reference distributions and values for 1-point Dixon
methodsHealthy participants from three centers-Duke University (Siemens), Cincinnati Children's Hospital (Philips), and the University of Iowa (General Electric)-underwent pulmonary function testing and a standardized
resultsThe reference distributions were consistent across sites and platforms for both imaging and spectroscopy. Combined imaging reference means were ventilation = 0.71 ± 0.14, membrane (M)/gas = 0.97 ± 0.27 × 10
conclusionsThese reference distributions provide a robust benchmark for 3T
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.