ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2025
Timing of progesterone treatment to prevent preterm birth in pregnancies with a short cervix: A population-based historical cohort study.
Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Timing of progesterone treatment to prevent preterm birth in pregnancies with a short cervix: A population-based historical cohort study.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionRandomized trials have shown that progesterone treatment in mothers with a short cervix may reduce the risk of preterm birth, but the optimal time window for treatment remains unknown. We aimed to investigate progesterone treatment for the prevention of preterm birth by gestational age at diagnosis and initiation of treatment. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis was a population-based historical cohort study of 1162 mothers with singleton pregnancies diagnosed with a cervix <20 mm from 16 to 31 gestational weeks receiving progesterone treatment (n = 390) or no preventive treatment (n = 772). Data were collected from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway from 2014 to 2020 and linked to national health registries providing demographic, diagnostic, and prescription information. Risks of preterm birth <28, <34, and <37 gestational weeks were compared between mothers with and without progesterone treatment in the full study sample and in three periods of gestational age at diagnosis (16-21, 22-27, and 28-31 weeks) using log-binomial regression analyses.
resultsThe absolute risk of preterm birth <28 gestational weeks was 0.8% in mothers treated with progesterone and 3.4% in mothers who did not receive treatment (adjusted relative risk (aRR) 0.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08-0.81). The strongest protective association was observed in mothers diagnosed from 16 to 21 weeks (aRR 0.13, 95% CI 0.02-0.98). Preterm birth <34 weeks occurred in 8.7% of mothers in the progesterone group and 11.1% in the untreated group (aRR 0.80, 95% CI 0.54-1.17), and the relative risk reduction associated with treatment diminished with increasing gestational age at diagnosis: aRR 0.27 (95% CI 0.08-0.96) from 16 to 21 weeks; aRR 0.68 (95% CI 0.38-1.23) from 22 to 27 weeks; and aRR 1.30 (95% CI 0.71-2.39) from 28 to 31 weeks. There was no difference in the risk of birth <37 weeks in mothers treated with progesterone (23.1%) and untreated mothers (22.3%), and the risk estimates were similar in the three periods of gestational age at diagnosis.
conclusionsCompared to no treatment, progesterone treatment is associated with a reduced risk of preterm birth <28 gestational weeks in pregnancies with a short cervix. The preventive effect of treatment may extend to 34 weeks if treatment is initiated early in the second trimester.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.