Observational studyAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association2025
Detection of emergency department patients at risk of dementia through artificial intelligence.
Observational study in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Can speech reveal mental health status? A study of linguistic features across multiple samples of at-risk adults.Journal of psychopathology and clinical science · 2026Article
- Enhancing automated detection and classification of dementia in individuals with cognitive impairment using artificial intelligence techniques.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Detection of emergency department patients at risk of dementia through artificial intelligence.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Observational
- Five-year dementia prediction and decision support system based on real-world data.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Article
- Red-flagging multimorbidity clusters for Alzheimer's disease risk using explainable machine learning: Evidence from a national emergency department sample.Journal of Alzheimer's disease reportsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe study aimed to develop and validate the Emergency Department Dementia Algorithm (EDDA) to detect dementia among older adults (65+) and support clinical decision-making in the emergency department (ED).
methodsIn a multisite retrospective study of 759,665 ED visits, electronic health record data from Yale New Haven Health (2014-2022) were used to train three supervised and semi-unsupervised positive-unlabeled machine learning models (XGBoost, Random Forest, LASSO). A separate test set of 400 ED encounters underwent adjudicated chart review for validation.
resultsEDDA achieved an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.85 in the test set and 0.93 in the validation set. Positive-unlabeled learning improved performance. Agreement between EDDA and clinician-adjudicated dementia diagnoses was moderate (kappa = 0.50), with 17% of EDDA-positive patients having undiagnosed probable dementia. DISCUSSION: EDDA enhances dementia detection in the ED, with potential for real-time implementation to improve patient outcomes and care transitions. HIGHLIGHTS: Developed a machine learning algorithm using electronic health record data to detect dementia in the emergency department (ED). Algorithm designed to balance detection accuracy with ease of ED implementation. Parsimonious model with limited but predictive variables selected for rapid ED use. Focused on real-time application, optimizing ED workflows, and clinician support. Aims to enhance ED dementia detection, patient safety, and care coordination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.