ArticleClinical interventions in aging2025
Higher Clinical Frailty Scale is Associated with Higher Visit-to-Visit Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Variability in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.
Article in Clinical interventions in aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have high risk of frailty. The clinical frailty scale (CFS) has been used to evaluate clinical frailty. To evaluate the association between CFS and visit-to-visit glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) variability in T2DM patients. Methods: Patients who were hospitalized with T2DM and received at least three HbA1C tests after discharging from endocrinology department and general practice department during 12-month follow-up were retrospectively enrolled. The patients were divided into the low-HbA1C variability group and the high-HbA1C variability group according to the results of the HbA1C variability score (HVS). The baseline clinical information, including CFS during hospitalization, was collected and compared between the two groups. We performed a propensity score match (PSM) to eliminate the influences of other confounding factors. Results: A total of 370 patients were included in this study. Most baseline demographic, clinical parameters and metabolic parameters were comparable between the two groups except age, baseline HbA1C, albumin, and comorbidities including hypertension and dyslipidemia between the two groups before PSM. All of the relative parameters were comparable after a 1:1 PSM. Uni-variable and multi-variable logistic analysis revealed that higher CFS was associated with higher HbA1C variability and receiver operating characteristic curve showed that CFS had good predictive value in HVS. Conclusion: Higher CFS was associated with higher visit-to-visit HbA1C variability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.