Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40459083›Full record

SynthesisChild development

"Here, Let Me Do It for You": Psychological Consequences of Receiving Direct and Indirect Help in Childhood.

Jellie Sierksma, Eddie Brummelman

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Child development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jellie SierksmaUtrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1690-5811
Eddie BrummelmanUniversity of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7695-5135

Funding

Jacobs Foundation 2020-1362-02Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek VI.Veni.191G.052Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek VI.Vidi.211.181
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

What are the psychological consequences of receiving direct and indirect help in childhood? We conducted three preregistered experiments (N = 619, 7-9 years, 80% Dutch, 51% girls, 49% boys, mostly higher socioeconomic status) in the Netherlands (July 2020-July 2022). Children received direct help (correct answer), indirect help (hint), or no help. An internal meta-analysis showed that children who received help felt less competent, liked the task less, and felt more in need of help. Children who received help also sought fewer challenges (Study 3). Effect sizes were modest. Direct and indirect help had largely similar effects, except that children disliked and misreported receiving direct help more. Thus, despite being well-intentioned, direct and indirect help can be discouraging.

Indexed as

Child BehaviorChildFemaleHumansMaleNetherlandsfeedbackmotivationself‐perceived abilityunsolicited help

Identifiers

PMID40459083
PMCPMC12379839

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.