Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40459126›Full record

ArticleeLife2025

Pathway activation model for personalized prediction of drug synergy.

Quang Thinh Trac, Yue Huang, Tom Erkers, Päivi Östling, Anna Bohlin, Albin Osterroos, Mattias Vesterlund, Rozbeh Jafari, Ioannis Siavelis, Helena Backvall and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Quang Thinh Trac *Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2429-0287
Yue Huang *Department of Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, China.
Tom ErkersDepartment of Oncology Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Science for Life Laboratory, Stockholm, Sweden.
Päivi ÖstlingDepartment of Oncology Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Science for Life Laboratory, Stockholm, Sweden.
Anna BohlinDepartment of Medicine Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Unit for Hematology, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden.
Albin OsterroosDepartment of Medical Sciences, Hematology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Mattias VesterlundDepartment of Oncology Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Science for Life Laboratory, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9471-6592
Rozbeh JafariDepartment of Oncology Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Science for Life Laboratory, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ioannis SiavelisDepartment of Oncology Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Science for Life Laboratory, Stockholm, Sweden.
Helena BackvallDepartment of Oncology Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Science for Life Laboratory, Stockholm, Sweden.
Santeri KiviluotoDepartment of Oncology Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Science for Life Laboratory, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lukas OrreDepartment of Oncology Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Science for Life Laboratory, Stockholm, Sweden.
Mattias RantalainenDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Janne LehtiöDepartment of Oncology Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Science for Life Laboratory, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8100-9562
Soren LehmannDepartment of Medicine Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Unit for Hematology, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden.
Olli KallioniemiDepartment of Oncology Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Science for Life Laboratory, Stockholm, Sweden.
Yudi PawitanDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Trung Nghia VuDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7945-5750

Funding

Cancerfonden 22 2020 PjSwedish Research Council 2019-01857
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Targeted monotherapies for cancer often fail due to inherent or acquired drug resistance. By aiming at multiple targets simultaneously, drug combinations can produce synergistic interactions that increase drug effectiveness and reduce resistance. Computational models based on the integration of omics data have been used to identify synergistic combinations, but predicting drug synergy remains a challenge. Here, we introduce Drug synergy Interaction Prediction (DIPx), an algorithm for personalized prediction of drug synergy based on biologically motivated tumor- and drug-specific pathway activation scores (PASs). We trained and validated DIPx in the AstraZeneca-Sanger (AZS) DREAM Challenge human cell-line dataset using two separate test sets: Test Set 1 comprised the combinations already present in the training set, while Test Set 2 contained combinations absent from the training set, thus indicating the model's ability to handle novel combinations. The Spearman's correlation coefficients between predicted and observed drug synergy were 0.50 (95% CI: 0.47-0.53) in Test Set 1 and 0.26 (95% CI: 0.22-0.30) in Test Set 2, compared to 0.38 (95% CI: 0.34-0.42) and 0.18 (95% CI: 0.16-0.20), respectively, for the best performing method in the Challenge. We show evidence that higher synergy is associated with higher functional interaction between the drug targets, and this functional interaction information is captured by PAS. We illustrate the use of PAS to provide a potential biological explanation in terms of activated pathways that mediate the synergistic effects of combined drugs. In summary, DIPx can be a useful tool for personalized prediction of drug synergy and exploration of activated pathways related to the effects of combined drugs.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsDrug SynergismNeoplasmsPrecision MedicineAlgorithmsCell Line, TumorComputational BiologyHumansAntineoplastic Agentscomputational biologydrug synergyhumanpathway activation scoreprediction modelsystems biology

Identifiers

PMID40459126
PMCPMC12133153

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.