Evidence mapPaperPMID 40459676Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2025

National trends in neoadjuvant systemic therapy utilization in patients with early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer from 2016-2021: The impact of the KATHERINE trial.

Lauren N Cohen, Christine C Rogers, Jan Irene C Lloren, Sailaja Kamaraju, Lubna N Chaudhary, Chiang-Ching Huang, Adrienne N Cobb, Puneet Singh, Amanda L Kong, Mediget Teshome and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lauren N CohenDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd., Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA.
Christine C RogersDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd., Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA.
Jan Irene C LlorenZibler School of Public Health, University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Sailaja KamarajuDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Lubna N ChaudharyDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Chiang-Ching HuangZibler School of Public Health, University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Adrienne N CobbDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd., Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA.
Puneet SinghDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Amanda L KongDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd., Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA.
Mediget TeshomeDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Chandler S CortinaDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd., Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA. ccortina@mcw.edu.

Funding

Understanding the Influence of Hormone Therapy on Breast Cancer Risk and Screening through Mixed MethodsK08CA276706 · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · 2025 to 2025
$210k
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA276706NIH HHS 1K08CA276706
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNeoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) for HER2 + breast cancer (HER2 + BC) has historically been used to downstage disease to facilitate surgical de-escalation; however, in 2019, the KATHERINE trial identified a survival benefit to adjuvant T-DM1 for those with residual disease after NST. We aimed to determine national rates of NST for patients with cT1-2 N0 M0 HER2 + BC and identify factors associated with receipt of NST vs upfront surgery with adjuvant systemic therapy (US-AST).

methodsA retrospective cohort study of women with cT1-2 N0 M0 HER2 + BC was performed using the National Cancer Database from 2016-2021. ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, Chi-square, Fisher's Exact tests, and a multivariable logistic regression analysis were used.

results54,449 patients met inclusion: 30,546 (56.1%) received US-AST and 19,562 (35.9%) received NST. NST utilization increased from 31.1% in 2016-17 to 43.3% in 2020-21. On regression analysis, women diagnosed in 2020-21 were more likely to receive NST (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.8-2.0). Populations less likely to receive NST included NH-Black women (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.8-0.95), age ≥ 70 (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.6-0.8), increasing comorbidities (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.5-0.9), and Medicare insurance (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.7-0.8). Patients with cT2 disease were more likely to receive NST vs those with cT1 disease (p < 0.001).

conclusionFrom 2016-2021, national rates of NST for patients with cT1-2 N0 HER2 + BC significantly increased. Race/ethnicity and insurance type were associated with receipt of NST underscoring ongoing disparities in care. Future studies are needed to determine the impact of the disparate rates of NST utilization on oncologic outcomes, given the survival benefit with adjuvant T-DM1 in those with residual disease after NST.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesNeoadjuvant TherapyAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesBreast cancerHER2NeoadjuvantUpfront surgery

Identifiers

PMID40459676
PMCPMC12213117

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.