ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2025
National trends in neoadjuvant systemic therapy utilization in patients with early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer from 2016-2021: The impact of the KATHERINE trial.
Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Expanding Eligibility for Targeted Axillary Dissection.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Personalized whole-genome-based ctDNA dynamics during neoadjuvant therapy across breast cancer subtypes: results from MONITOR-Breast.Future oncology (London, England) · 2026Observational
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on breast cancer screening, treatment, and overall survival.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2026Article
- Article
- ASO Author Reflections: Prognostic and Therapeutic Implications of Nodal Burden in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeNeoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) for HER2 + breast cancer (HER2 + BC) has historically been used to downstage disease to facilitate surgical de-escalation; however, in 2019, the KATHERINE trial identified a survival benefit to adjuvant T-DM1 for those with residual disease after NST. We aimed to determine national rates of NST for patients with cT1-2 N0 M0 HER2 + BC and identify factors associated with receipt of NST vs upfront surgery with adjuvant systemic therapy (US-AST).
methodsA retrospective cohort study of women with cT1-2 N0 M0 HER2 + BC was performed using the National Cancer Database from 2016-2021. ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, Chi-square, Fisher's Exact tests, and a multivariable logistic regression analysis were used.
results54,449 patients met inclusion: 30,546 (56.1%) received US-AST and 19,562 (35.9%) received NST. NST utilization increased from 31.1% in 2016-17 to 43.3% in 2020-21. On regression analysis, women diagnosed in 2020-21 were more likely to receive NST (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.8-2.0). Populations less likely to receive NST included NH-Black women (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.8-0.95), age ≥ 70 (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.6-0.8), increasing comorbidities (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.5-0.9), and Medicare insurance (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.7-0.8). Patients with cT2 disease were more likely to receive NST vs those with cT1 disease (p < 0.001).
conclusionFrom 2016-2021, national rates of NST for patients with cT1-2 N0 HER2 + BC significantly increased. Race/ethnicity and insurance type were associated with receipt of NST underscoring ongoing disparities in care. Future studies are needed to determine the impact of the disparate rates of NST utilization on oncologic outcomes, given the survival benefit with adjuvant T-DM1 in those with residual disease after NST.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.