Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40459736›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2025

Deep learning-based automatic segmentation of arterial vessel walls and plaques in MR vessel wall images for quantitative assessment.

Long Yang, Xiong Yang, Zhenhuan Gong, Yufei Mao, Shan-Shan Lu, Chengcheng Zhu, Liwen Wan, Junhui Huang, Mohd Halim Mohd Noor, Ke Wu and 8 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A radiomics-based approach with automated segmentation for identifying symptomatic basilar artery plaques in acute stroke.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Long Yang *Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
Xiong Yang *Department of Image Advanced Analysis of HSW BU, Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co., Shanghai, 201800, China.
Zhenhuan Gong *Department of Image Advanced Analysis of HSW BU, Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co., Shanghai, 201800, China.
Yufei MaoDepartment of Image Advanced Analysis of HSW BU, Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co., Shanghai, 201800, China.
Shan-Shan LuDepartment of Radiology, Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing, 210029, China.
Chengcheng ZhuDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Liwen WanLauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
Junhui HuangLauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
Mohd Halim Mohd NoorSchool of Computer Sciences, University Sains Malaysia, 11800, Penang, Malaysia.
Ke WuDepartment of Image Advanced Analysis of HSW BU, Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co., Shanghai, 201800, China.
Cheng LiDepartment of Image Advanced Analysis of HSW BU, Shanghai United Imaging Healthcare Co., Shanghai, 201800, China.
Guanxun ChengDepartment of Radiology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, 518036, China.
Ye LiLauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
Dong LiangLauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
Xin LiuLauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
Hairong ZhengLauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
Zhanli HuLauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
Na ZhangLauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, 518055, China. na.zhang@siat.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9510-4520

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop and validate a deep-learning-based automatic method for vessel walls and atherosclerotic plaques segmentation for quantitative evaluation in MR vessel wall images. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 193 patients (107 patients for training and validation, 39 patients for internal test, 47 patients for external test) with atherosclerotic plaque from five centers underwent T1-weighted MRI scans and were included in the dataset. The first step of the proposed method was constructing a purely learning-based convolutional neural network (CNN) named Vessel-SegNet to segment the lumen and the vessel wall. The second step is using the vessel wall priors (including manual prior and Tversky-loss-based automatic prior) to improve the plaque segmentation, which utilizes the morphological similarity between the vessel wall and the plaque. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), etc., were used to evaluate the similarity, agreement, and correlations.

resultsMost of the DSCs for lumen and vessel wall segmentation were above 90%. The introduction of vessel wall priors can increase the DSC for plaque segmentation by over 10%, reaching 88.45%. Compared to dice-loss-based vessel wall priors, the Tversky-loss-based priors can further improve DSC by nearly 3%, reaching 82.84%. Most of the ICC values between the Vessel-SegNet and manual methods in the 6 quantitative measurements are greater than 85% (p-value < 0.001).

conclusionThe proposed CNN-based segmentation model can quickly and accurately segment vessel walls and plaques for quantitative evaluation. Due to the lack of testing with other equipment, populations, and anatomical studies, the reliability of the research results still requires further exploration. KEY POINTS: Question How can the accuracy and efficiency of vessel component segmentation for quantification, including the lumen, vessel wall, and plaque, be improved? Findings Improved CNN models, manual/automatic vessel wall priors, and Tversky loss can improve the performance of semi-automatic/automatic vessel components segmentation for quantification. Clinical relevance Manual segmentation of vessel components is a time-consuming yet important process. Rapid and accurate segmentation of the lumen, vessel walls, and plaques for quantification assessment helps patients obtain more accurate, efficient, and timely stroke risk assessments and clinical recommendations.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance AngiographyMagnetic Resonance ImagingPlaque, AtheroscleroticAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerReproducibility of ResultsAtherosclerotic plaqueDeep learningQualitative evaluation

Identifiers

PMID40459736

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.