ArticleAmerican journal of speech-language pathology2025
Construct Validity of the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Bulbar Dysfunction Index-Remote.
Article in American journal of speech-language pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Bulbar Dysfunction Index-Remote (ALSBDI-R) is a clinician-administered tool designed to assess bulbar dysfunction remotely in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). This study aimed to evaluate the construct validity of the ALSBDI-R by examining its correlation with established clinical measures and its ability to discriminate among different bulbar disease severities.
methodA total of 92 patients with ALS were recruited from two multidisciplinary clinics. Participants were assessed using the ALSBDI-R, the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R), the Center for Neurologic Study Bulbar Function Scale (CNS-BFS), the Sentence Intelligibility Test, and the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10). Construct validity was established through Spearman correlations and comparison of ALSBDI-R scores across bulbar severity groups (asymptomatic, mild, moderate, severe).
resultsStrong correlations were found between ALSBDI-R total scores and bulbar-specific measures such as ALSFRS-R bulbar subscore (
conclusionsThe ALSBDI-R is a valid tool for remotely assessing bulbar dysfunction in patients with ALS. Despite several limitations, its ability to capture varying degrees of severity makes it valuable for clinical use and research, offering a standardized approach to monitor disease progression remotely.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.