SynthesisJournal of medical Internet research2025
Sociodemographic and Socioeconomic Determinants for the Usage of Digital Patient Portals in Hospitals: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Digital Divide.
Synthesis in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient Portal Adoption Barriers in a Safety-Net Clinic: A Mixed-Methods Study With National Comparison.The Permanente journal · 2026Article
- Patient Portal Activation Disparities by Ward, Census Tract, and Zip Code in an Urban Landscape Among Neurology Patients: Cross-Sectional Multi-Scale Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Article
- Policy Considerations for National Virtual Hospitals: Global Evidence and the Seha Virtual Hospital Model.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Empowering Older Adults Through Values-Informed Solutions for Technology Adoption: Protocol for a Feasibility and Acceptability Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- The Role of Trust in Text Messaging for Promoting Patient Portal Activation Among Low-Income Patients: Quality Improvement Project.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Training needs in telerehabilitation: results of a cross-sectional online survey with therapists and patients.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Protocol for a randomized controlled trial of patient-portal-based screening for substance use among people with HIV.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- The impact of the digital divide on residents' healthcare consumption inequality: evidence from CFPS in China.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Digital access and health outcomes: The moderating role of socioeconomic status in health information seeking.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDigital patient portals (PPs) are platforms that enhance patient engagement and promote active involvement in health care by providing remote access to personal health data. Although many hospitals are legally required to offer these portals, adoption varies widely among patients, often influenced by sociodemographic and socioeconomic determinants. Evidence suggests that higher income, education, employment status, and specific age groups correlate with increased portal usage, highlighting a digital divide. This study aims to analyze sociodemographic and socioeconomic determinants affecting digital PP usage, addressing inconsistencies in existing research and contributing to strategies for reducing digital health disparities.
objectiveThis study aimed to conduct a meta-analysis of the sociodemographic and socioeconomic factors contributing to the digital divide in the usage of digital PPs.
methodsA systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines in PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, and EBSCOhost. Screening involved 3 reviewers with consensus meetings to resolve discrepancies. Data on sociodemographic and socioeconomic factors and statistical outcomes were extracted, and study quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal tool. Results were visualized using forest and funnel plots to assess heterogeneity and publication bias.
resultsA total of 2225 studies were identified through a systematic review, and after title and abstract screening, 17 studies were included in the quantitative and qualitative analysis. The qualitative analysis revealed that younger patients (younger than 65 y) were significantly more likely to use the digital PP, while the meta-analysis revealed that women had a 16% higher likelihood of using the digital PP than men. The relationship between income and digital PP usage was inconsistent, due to different scaling in different studies. A higher level of education was significantly associated with a 37% greater likelihood of using the digital PP in the meta-analysis. In addition, employed patients were 23% more likely to use the digital PP, while married patients had a 13% higher likelihood of using it than unmarried patients. Marital status and employment can be considered as measurable factors of social relationships.
conclusionsThe review confirms that sociodemographic and socioeconomic factors significantly influence the usage of digital PP in hospital care. Marital status shows that social support plays a vital role, with married patients 13% more likely to engage with digital PPs. It is worth noting that social support through connections to society via work or work colleagues can also play an important role as like as a partner at home, with employed individuals being 22% more likely to use digital PPs. Overall, sociodemographic factors, like marital status, primarily affect usage patterns, while socioeconomic factors, like employment, enable access, emphasizing the need for comprehensive support systems to bridge the digital divide in health care.
trial registrationGerman register of clinical trials DRKS00033125; https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00033125 and PROSPERO CRD42024567203; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024567203.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.