ArticleScientific reports2025
Effects of occupational dust exposure on the health status of workers in China.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Exposure to cement industry emissions and respiratory health outcomes: a global systematic review and meta-analysis from 2000 to 2025.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Occupational exposure and health risks among traditional copper bell makers in India: a comprehensive assessment with policy and preventive implications.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Differences in hepatocyte-related indicators within occupational hazardous factor exposure between genders.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- The burden of chronic respiratory disease in Western Pacific Region from 1990 to 2021: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2021.BMC public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This cross-sectional study examined the health impacts of occupational dust exposure on workers in Fujian Province, China, using data collected from 2020 to 2021. The primary objective was to assess the associations between occupational dust exposure and several adverse health outcomes, including abnormal chest X-ray (Abn-CXR), abnormal pulmonary function tests (Abn-PFTs), pneumoconiosis (PC), abnormal electrocardiograms (Abn-ECGs), abnormal liver function tests (Abn-LFTs), hypertension (HTN), and hearing loss (HL). logistic regression models were employed to identify significant risk factors. Stratified analyses by age and gender were performed to evaluate demographic differences in health risks. The results showed that workers currently employed, those with over 10 years of dust exposure, and workers exposed to silica, cement, or coal dust had a higher risk of Abn-CXR, Abn-PFTs, PC, Abn-ECGs, Abn-LFTs, HTN, and HL. Stratified analyses further revealed that male workers and individuals over 40 years old experienced a higher risk of abnormal health outcomes. These findings underscore the urgent need for targeted interventions, improved protective measures, and stricter occupational safety regulations to reduce the health burden associated with dust exposure in the workplace.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.