ArticleBMC nephrology2025
Effects of RAAS blockade on acute kidney injury in head and neck cancer patients post-chemoradiotherapy.
Article in BMC nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) is high among head and neck cancer (HNC) patients following Platinum-based concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT). However, the effect of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockade on the risk of AKI in HNC patients undergoing CCRT is controversial. This study aimed to investigate the association between RAAS blockade, AKI and survival in HNC patients undergoing CCRT.
methodThis retrospective cohort study included 989 HNC patients treated between January 2016 and July 2022, with follow-up extending to July 2022. Among them, 65 (6.6%) patients were using RAAS blockade for hypertension control, while 924 were non-users. Clinical data and demographics were retrieved. Cox regression models were employed to analyze primary outcomes, including AKI and patient survival.
resultsThere were 65 (6.6%) patients being RAAS blockade users in the study. The mean age of RAAS blockade users was older than that of non-users (61 vs. 55 years old, p < 0.001). Overall, 219 (22.1%) patients developed AKI, including 25 RAAS blockade users. RAAS blockade users had a higher risk of AKI compared to non-users (38% vs. 21%, p = 0.001) and also had a worse mortality rate (35% vs. 22%, p = 0.015). Factors such as male gender, age, RAAS blockade usage, and baseline serum creatinine levels independently predicted the onset of AKI and patient survival.
conclusionRAAS blockade users developed AKI, which significantly predicted patient survival. Diligent post-CCRT renal function monitoring and hydration in RAAS blockade users are crucial to mitigate AKI risk and potentially improve survival in this patient group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.