Trial reportBMC psychiatry2025
Experiences of the attention training technique delivered in groups as treatment for anxiety and depression in patients with coronary heart disease: a qualitative study.
Trial report in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05621408 (Attention Training Technique in Treatment of Anxiety and Depression in Coronary Heart Disease Patients -a Randomized Controlled Trial With 6 Months Follow-up), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Attention Training Technique in Treatment of Anxiety and Depression in Coronary Heart Disease Patients -a Randomized Controlled Trial With 6 Months Follow-up
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Analysis on quality of life, anxiety, and depression of diquat self-poisoning after returning to the community: a follow-up study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClinically significant anxiety and depression symptoms are common in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and associated with a range of negative outcomes. Preliminary evidence suggests that the attention training technique (ATT), a component of metacognitive therapy (MCT), delivered in a group format, is feasible and potentially effective in reducing symptoms of anxiety and depression in these patients. Patients' experiences of treatment including facilitators and barriers are useful in order to further develop effective intervention. We are not aware of any previous qualitative studies conducted on ATT in patients with CHD. Our study aimed to assess the treatment experiences in these patients.
methodsPatients (N = 10) with CHD and significant symptoms of anxiety and/or depression, who participated in a randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of ATT delivered in a group format, were recruited to in-depth, individual interviews three months after treatment completion. The interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed according to the principles of thematic analysis.
resultsNine males and one female participated, with a mean age of 54.3 (range 45-63) years. Mean time since cardiac event was 54.2 months. We identified two main themes; non-specific ATT treatment factors and group ATT-specific treatment factors. Furthermore, non-specific ATT treatment factors included subthemes relating to individual and group factors. These subthemes encompassed the (relational aspects such as the) interaction between the group patients, interaction between the patients and the therapist, and the therapist's delivery of the group ATT. Second, specific ATT treatment factors included subthemes concerning understanding and making sense of the technique and treatment, changes in relation to thoughts and thinking, and group format as a facilitator of ATT treatment.
conclusionsGroup ATT was perceived as helpful among outpatients with CHD in terms of symptom relief. Both general and ATT specific factors were regarded important, and the patients seemed to understand ATT in a way that is consistent with the rationale of ATT treatment. All patients emphasized the importance of the group format.
trial registrationThe study was approved by the Regional Committee of Ethics (REK) South East Norway (REK 52002) and by the data protection officer at Drammen Hospital (20/04048-1/005). The study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier NCT05621408).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.