Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40462152›Full record

ArticleMolecular horticulture2025

Genomic insights into Castanopsis carlesii and Castanea henryi: flower and fruit development and evolution of NLR genes in the beech-oak family.

Xiong-De Tu, Wen-Jun Lin, Ya-Xuan Xin, Hou-Hua Fu, Cheng-Yuan Zhou, Yi-Zhe Lin, Jun Shen, Shuai Chen, Hui Lian, Shu-Zhen Jiang and 9 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular horticulture, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Genetic Variation in the Main Cultivar Collection ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Xiong-De Tu *College of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, China.
Wen-Jun Lin *College of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, China.
Ya-Xuan XinCollege of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, China.
Hou-Hua FuCollege of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, China.
Cheng-Yuan ZhouCollege of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, China.
Yi-Zhe LinCollege of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, China.
Jun ShenCollege of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, China.
Shuai ChenCollege of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, China.
Hui LianFujian Province Forestry Survey Planning Institute, Fuzhou, 350003, China.
Shu-Zhen JiangSoil and Water Conservation Experimental Station of Fujian Province, Fuzhou, 350003, China.
Bin LiuChongqing Engineering Research Center for Floriculture, College of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, China.
Yu LiCollege of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, China.
Zi WangCollege of Juncao Science and Ecology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, China.
Ding-Kun LiuCollege of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, China.
Zhi-Wen WangPubBio-Tech, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Siren LanCollege of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, China.
Ming-He LiCollege of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, China. fjalmh@fafu.edu.cn.
Zhong-Jian LiuKey Laboratory of National Forestry and Grassland Administration for Orchid Conservation and Utilization at College of Landscape Architecture and Art, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, China. zjliu@fafu.edu.cn.
Shi-Pin ChenCollege of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, China. chenshipin@fafu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8090-6616

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 32271957National Natural Science Foundation of China 32470226Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of Fujian Province 2024J010023the Forestry Peak Discipline Construction Project of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University 72202200205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Fagaceae family, comprising over 900 species, is an essential component of Northern Hemisphere forest ecosystems. However, genomic data for tropical and subtropical genera Castanopsis and Castanea remain limited compared to the well-studied oak. Here, we present chromosome-level genome assemblies of Castanopsis carlesii and Castanea henryi, with assembled genome sizes of 927.24 Mb (N50 = 1.57 Mb) and 780.10 Mb (N50 = 1.07 Mb), respectively, and repetitive sequence contents of 45.79% and 44.88%. Comparative genomic analysis revealed that the estimated divergence time between Castanopsis and Castanea was determined to be 48.3 Mya and provided evidence that both genera experienced only one of the ancient whole genome triplication event (γ event) shared with most eudicots. The development of C. carlesii flower bracts and cupules was controlled by A- and E-class genes, suggesting that the cupules may originate from the bracts. Additionally, genes involved in sucrose and starch metabolism genes played distinct roles during C. carlesii fruit development. The amplification of the nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat (NLR) gene family in Fagaceae exhibited similarities, indicating that this expansion may be an adaptation to similar environmental pressures. This study provides valuable genomic resources for Asian Fagaceae and enhances our understanding of Fagaceae evolution.

Indexed as

FagaceaeGenomicsMADS-box genesResistance genesSucrose-starch metabolism

Identifiers

PMID40462152
PMCPMC12135283

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.