Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40462415›Full record

ReviewVeterinary clinical pathology2025

Artificial Intelligence in Veterinary Clinical Pathology-An Introduction and Review.

Samuel V Neal, Daniel G Rudmann, Kara N Corps

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Veterinary clinical pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Samuel V NealDepartment of Veterinary Biosciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3132-3614
Daniel G RudmannModerna Inc, Pathology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Kara N CorpsDepartment of Veterinary Biosciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly through machine learning and deep learning, presents opportunities for the enhancement of the workflow of the veterinary clinical pathologist. This review introduces basic concepts in AI in a nontechnical manner and explores the qualification and integration of AI in veterinary clinical pathology. The veterinary clinical pathologist must play an active role in defining the intended use, design, and qualification of these methods as well as the plan for monitoring their responsible application in practice.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligencePathology, ClinicalPathology, VeterinaryAnimalsDeep LearningMachine LearningAIcytologydeep learningdigital pathologymachine learning

Identifiers

PMID40462415
PMCPMC12852980

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.