ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Collective unstructured interactions drive chromatin binding of transcription factors.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Eukaryotic transcription factors (TFs) contain both structured DNA-binding domains (DBDs) and intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs). While the structures and sequence preferences of DBDs have been extensively characterized, the role of IDR-mediated interactions in chromatin binding and nuclear organization remains poorly understood, in part because these interactions have been difficult to measure in living cells. Here, we use a recently developed single-molecule technique, proximity-assisted photoactivation (PAPA), to investigate how IDRs influence TF associations with each other and with chromatin, focusing on the factors Sp1 and Klf1. We find that the number and patterning of aromatic and basic residues within IDRs govern both TF self-association and chromatin binding. Unexpectedly, the isolated DBD of Sp1 binds chromatin very weakly and non-specifically. The isolated IDR, by contrast, interacts poorly with chromatin-bound wild-type Sp1, yet this interaction is enhanced when even minimal DNA-binding capacity is restored. Strikingly, replacing Sp1's native DBD with those of heterologous TFs recovers both IDR-mediated interactions and chromatin association, despite divergent sequence preferences. PAPA measurements also reveal extensive heterotypic interactions between wild-type Sp1 and other TFs. Together, these results establish PAPA as a powerful method for studying unstructured interactions in their native context and suggest that IDRs participate in widespread cooperative associations scaffolded by transient DBD-DNA contacts, which concentrate disordered regions along chromatin. In contrast to classical models, we propose that TF specificity
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.