ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Construction of a prognostic model for endometrial cancer related to programmed cell death using WGCNA and machine learning algorithms.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Establishiment of PANoptosis-related prognostic signature and experimental identification of SIGLEC1 as an oncogenic biomarker in endometrial cancer.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- A Novel Mitochondria-Associated Programmed Cell Death-Related Prognostic Model and Validation of Oncogene INHBB in Colorectal Cancer.International journal of genomics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Programmed cell death (PCD) refers to a regulated and active process of cellular demise, initiated by specific biological signals. PCD plays a crucial role in the development, progression, and drug resistance of uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma (UCEC), making the exploration of its relationship with UCEC prognosis highly clinically relevant. Methods: Data from UCEC patients and control cohorts were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified and subsequently intersected with a PCD gene set to discern PCD-related differentially expressed genes (PCD-DEGs). To isolate core prognostic PCD-DEGs, methods including consistency clustering analysis, weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), univariate Cox regression analysis, and five machine learning techniques for dimensionality reduction were utilized. Validation of three core prognostic PCD-DEGs was conducted using RT-qPCR, and these genes were used to develop a prognostic model. Additionally, an analysis of drug sensitivity was performed. Results: Consistency clustering analysis revealed significant differences in prognosis and tumor microenvironment among subtypes, strongly associated with various immune subtypes. The three core prognostic PCD-DEGs identified-SRPX, NT5E, and ATP6V1C2-were instrumental in constructing the lasso prognostic model and nomogram. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis confirmed the model's strong prognostic performance and clinical applicability. The high-risk group exhibited lower tumor mutation frequencies, a higher propensity for immune escape, reduced response to immune therapy, and potential benefits from potent chemotherapy drugs. Conclusion: This study developed a prognostic model related to PCD for UCEC using comprehensive bioinformatics analyses. The model demonstrates robust predictive performance and holds significant potential for clinical application, thereby facilitating precise stratification and personalized treatment of UCEC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.