Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40463588›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025

Differential retinal ganglion cell resilience to optic nerve injury across vertebrate species.

Julie D De Schutter, Anyi Zhang, Pieter-Jan Serneels, Lieve Moons, Luca Masin, Steven Bergmans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Lineage tracing revealsbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Julie D De Schutter *Division of Animal Physiology and Neurobiology, Department of Biology, Neural Circuit Development and Regeneration Research Group, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Anyi Zhang *Division of Animal Physiology and Neurobiology, Department of Biology, Neural Circuit Development and Regeneration Research Group, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Pieter-Jan SerneelsDivision of Animal Physiology and Neurobiology, Department of Biology, Neural Circuit Development and Regeneration Research Group, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Lieve MoonsDivision of Animal Physiology and Neurobiology, Department of Biology, Neural Circuit Development and Regeneration Research Group, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Luca MasinDivision of Animal Physiology and Neurobiology, Department of Biology, Neural Circuit Development and Regeneration Research Group, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Steven BergmansDivision of Animal Physiology and Neurobiology, Department of Biology, Neural Circuit Development and Regeneration Research Group, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optic neuropathies comprise a diverse group of disorders that ultimately lead to retinal ganglion cell (RGC) degeneration. Despite varying etiologies, these conditions share a conserved pathological progression: axonal damage in the optic nerve triggers progressive RGC degeneration. Understanding species-specific differences in neuronal resilience is critical for identifying key survival mechanisms and potential neuroprotective targets. In this study, we compare RGC densities and survival rates following optic nerve crush (ONC) in three vertebrate models-mice, zebrafish, and killifish-under standardized experimental conditions. Transcriptomic analysis confirmed that, similar to RBPMS in mice, Rbpms2 serves as a pan-RGC marker in zebrafish and killifish. Using these markers, we reveal significant species-specific differences in RGC density, with fish species exhibiting over a 5-fold higher density than mice at equivalent life stage. Killifish also show an age-dependent decline in RGC density. Furthermore, we identify distinct injury responses across species: mice undergo rapid degeneration, losing ∼80% of their RGCs by day 14 after ONC; zebrafish maintain full RGC retention for 2 weeks before experiencing a loss of ∼12%; and killifish display a biphasic response to ONC, with young adults retaining two-thirds of their RGCs by day 21, while older fish exhibit a more pronounced second wave of RGC loss, ultimately preserving just over half of their RGCs by 21 days after injury. These findings highlight fundamental differences in neuroprotective capacity among species, providing a comparative framework to uncover molecular mechanisms governing RGC survival and to identify therapeutic strategies for treating optic neuropathies and neurodegeneration across diverse pathologies.

Indexed as

killifishmouseneuroprotectionoptic nerve crushretinaretinal ganglion cellsurvivalzebrafish

Identifiers

PMID40463588
PMCPMC12129905

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.