SynthesisFamily practice2025
Effectiveness of interactive dashboards to optimize prescribing in general practice: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Family practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Public Reporting Systems in Health Care and the Underconceptualized Technical Substrate, a Core Information Systems Dimension: Scoping Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Developing and assessing the usability of a prescribing quality and safety dashboard in Irish general practice: protocol for a qualitative study.HRB open research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe World Health Organisation's Medication Without Harm campaign aims to reduce severe avoidable medication-related harm by 50%. This systematic review explored the characteristics of interventions that provide visual and longitudinal feedback on prescribing (interactive dashboards), in general practice and the effect of these interventions on prescribing-related outcomes.
methodsThis systematic review was registered prospectively and reported in line with PRISMA guidelines. Multiple databases and grey literature were searched in November 2023 to identify interventional studies that explored the effect of interactive dashboards on prescribing-related outcomes in general practice. Two independent researchers conducted screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. Interventions were described narratively, and a random-effects meta-analysis was performed for comparable studies.
resultsTen randomized controlled trials, one controlled before-and-after study, and three interrupted time series were included. Seven studies reported a significant positive effect on prescribing-related outcomes, with an effect seen more often for studies focussing on potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) (four out of six). Three of the eight studies that focussed on antibiotic prescribing demonstrated a significant effect. A meta-analysis of three RCTs involving 160 general practices and 198 135 patients demonstrated the overall odds of PIP was 0.92 (95%CI: 0.78-1.06, I2 = 70.1%) in the intervention compared to the control group.
conclusionInteractive dashboards show promise for supporting safe and effective prescribing in general practice, but current evidence is inconclusive. Future research should focus on developing core outcome sets to facilitate future meta-analyses of effectiveness as well as optimizing their implementation and understanding how to sustain user engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.