Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40464827›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of surgical oncology2025

Prehabilitation in Frail Patients Undergoing Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Zirong Bai, Cherry Koh, Michael Solomon, Rihan Shahab, Nicholas Hirst, Kate Alexander, Leani Souza Maximo Pereira, Ana Paula Drumond Lage, Daniel Steffens

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Clinical Frailty Scale predicts overall survival after colon cancer surgery in people aged 80 years and older: A prospective multicentre observational study.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025
    Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zirong BaiSurgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0058-2026
Cherry KohSurgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2547-0204
Michael SolomonSurgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5602-6045
Rihan ShahabCentral Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Nicholas HirstSurgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3803-9368
Kate AlexanderSurgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Leani Souza Maximo PereiraPostgraduate Program in Health Sciences, Faculdade Ciências Médicas de Minas Gerais (FCMMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Ana Paula Drumond LagePostgraduate Program in Health Sciences, Faculdade Ciências Médicas de Minas Gerais (FCMMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7253-4392
Daniel SteffensSurgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, Australia. Daniel.Steffens@health.nsw.gov.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9715-860X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe evidence of prehabilitation in frail patients with cancer is lacking. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the effectiveness of prehabilitation on postoperative complications, and hospital length of stay (LOS) in this population.

methodsA comprehensive search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, CINAHL, AMED, and PsycINFO, encompassing all records from inception to December 2023. The outcomes of interest included postoperative complications and LOS. Risk of bias was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB2) and GRADE was used to determine the quality of evidence. Relative risk (RR) or mean difference (MD) along with its 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated by using random-effects meta-analysis.

resultsFive randomised controlled trials (four trials in colorectal or colon cancer), including 466 patients (230 patients undergoing prehabilitation and 236 standard of care controls), were included. Prehabilitation reduced any postoperative complications (RR = 0.82; 95% CI = 0.71-0.95; four trials, N = 465), but no effect was observed for major postoperative complications (RR = 0.89: 95% CI = 0.71-1.11; two trials, N = 226) and LOS (MD = 0.3, 95% CI = -0.68 to 1.28; three trials, N = 349). A single trial (including 57 patients) investigated the effect of exercise-only on a range of postoperative complications, with no significant difference between groups observed.

conclusionsIn our systematic review and meta-analysis, we found that prehabilitation significantly decreased the rate of any postoperative complications in frail patients with cancer undergoing surgery. The role of prehabilitation in improving major postoperative outcomes is unclear owing to the limited amount of evidence.

Indexed as

Frail ElderlyFrailtyNeoplasmsPostoperative ComplicationsPreoperative CarePreoperative ExerciseHumansLength of StayRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID40464827
PMCPMC12454461

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.