Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40464918›Full record

Trial reportEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2025

Examining swallowing parameters of the Yale Swallow Protocol in healthy individuals: Establishing Normative Data.

Angela Van Sickle, Ed M Bice, Abdul Awal, Debra Suiter

Erratum issuedAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Angela Van SickleDepartment of Speech, Language, Hearing Sciences, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, 3601 4th Street STOP 6073, Lubbock, TX, 79430, USA. angela.van-sickle@ttuhsc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-3729-2317
Ed M BiceIOPI Medical, LLC, 18500 156th Avenue NE, Suite 104, Woodinville, WA, 98072, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5753-9133
Abdul AwalClinical Research Institute, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, 3601 4th Street STOP 8183, Lubbock, TX, 79430, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6400-472X
Debra SuiterVoice and Swallow Clinic, University of Kentucky, 740 South Limestone, Lexington, KY, 40536, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7833-5175

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCurrently, the Yale Swallow Protocol overidentifies prandial aspiration. The current investigation aimed to establish normative data for the number of swallows, average volume per swallow, time to complete, and integrated surface electromyography signal (area under the curve) for the consumption of 3 oz (90 mL) of water.

methodsParticipants were divided into three groups: younger adults (n = 65, = 22.8 years), middle-aged adults (n = 62, = 53.2 years), and older adults (n = 65, = 81.5 years). Participants consumed 3 oz (90 mL) of water while connected to a surface electromyography device. Descriptive statistics and the main effects of age were computed.

resultsData for the number of swallows, average volume per swallow, time to complete, and integrated surface electromyography signal (area under the curve) were reported. For the 3-oz (90 mL) task, the number of swallows consistently increased as age increased. Younger and middle-aged adults consumed 3 oz of water with a statistically significant fewer number of swallows when compared to older adults (younger p = 0.008 and middle-aged p = 0.017). Although it did not reach statistical significance, younger adults swallowed fewer times than middle-aged adults (p = 0.822). The average volume per swallow decreased as age increased. Although younger and middle-aged adults consumed similar average volumes per swallow, younger adults swallowed a statistically significant greater average amount per swallow than older adults (p = 0.001) as did middle-aged adults (p = 0.001). The time to complete increased as age increased. Although there were no statistically significant differences between younger and middle-aged adults, older adults took significantly more time to consume 3 oz of water than middle-aged adults (p = 0.004) and younger adults (p = 0.001). The middle-aged adults had the smallest, and younger adults had the largest area under the curve. There were significant differences between younger and middle-aged adults (p = 0.004) and middle-aged and older adults (p = 0.043).

conclusionThe study provided normative data for number of swallows, average volume per swallow, time to complete, and integrated surface electromyography signal or area under the curve while consuming 3 oz (90 mL) of water. Data from the current study provides a foundation for future research to examine the sensitivity and specificity of the YSP using additional parameters.

Indexed as

DeglutitionElectromyographyAged, 80 and overArea Under CurveDrinkingFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMiddle AgedReference StandardsReference ValuesWaterYoung AdultWaterNormative dataSwallowingYale Swallow Protocol

Identifiers

PMID40464918
PMCPMC12494668

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.