ReviewThe Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology2025
Unravelling the role of electrocardiogram changes and ejection fraction in ischaemic stroke outcomes.
Review in The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStroke, a prevailing global cause of mortality, is witnessing a surge in incidences, particularly in lower-income countries. However, existing guidelines fail to adequately address the impact of electrocardiogram (ECG) changes and ejection fraction on the outcomes of ischaemic stroke, as well as the management of stroke-heart syndrome. MAIN BODY: Existing literature underscores a strong link between ischaemic stroke and subsequent cardiac manifestations, hinting at their potential as prognostic indicators for adverse stroke outcomes. Post-ischaemic stroke ECG changes correlate with heightened heart disease risks, emphasising the need for post-stroke ECG monitoring. Recommendations include the use of direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin within 14 days of stroke for atrial fibrillation and thrombolytics for other ischaemic strokes. Conflicting findings exist on the prognostic significance of lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) post-ischaemic stroke, with some studies indicating poorer outcomes. Currently, LVEF does not significantly impact managing ischaemic stroke patients, but anticoagulation may be considered. Stroke-heart syndrome, a rare post-stroke complication, lacks clear understanding and guidelines for physicians.
conclusionsECG changes emerge as potential stroke outcome predictors, with ongoing debate on the utility of lower LVEF. While an ABC approach shows some efficacy for stroke-heart syndrome, additional research is crucial to unravel its ambiguous physiology and clarify these uncertainties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.