Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40465296›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2025

Provision of COVID-19 Self-Test Kits to Patients for Distribution to Social Contacts: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Cedric H Bien-Gund, Alisa J Stephens-Shields, Trisha Acri, Karen Dugosh, Robert Gross

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04797858 (Secondary Distribution of COVID-19 Self-tests vs. Referrals to Increase Test Uptake in Underserved Populations), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04797858 nacompletednot on this map

Secondary Distribution of COVID-19 Self-tests vs. Referrals to Increase Test Uptake in Underserved Populations

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PennsylvaniaRan2021 to 2023Enrolled792ConditionsCovid19ArmsCOVID-19 self-test, COVID-19 test referral
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cedric H Bien-GundDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia.
Alisa J Stephens-ShieldsDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia.
Trisha AcriCourage Medicine Health Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Karen DugoshPublic Health Management Corporation, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Robert GrossDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia.

Funding

Determinants and Outcomes of Nicotine Metabolite Ratio in HIV + SmokersR01HL151292 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ASHARE, REBECCA, GROSS, ROBERT · 2020 to 2022
$3.4M
Promoting linkage to PrEP after HIV self-testing through a peer-led intervention for MSMK23MH131468 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Cedric Howshan Bien-Gund · 2023 to 2026
$778k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL151292NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH131468
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Widespread and equitable access to testing remains critical to controlling the COVID-19 pandemic, which has disproportionately affected medically underserved communities. Objective: To determine whether secondary distribution of COVID-19 self-test (ST) kits, in which an individual distributes ST kits to contacts in their social networks, increases COVID-19 testing. Design, Setting, and Participants: The COVID-19 Self-Testing Through Rapid Network Distribution study was a randomized clinical trial conducted between May 2021 and September 2023 at 4 federally qualified health centers serving medically underserved populations in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Participants were adults aged 18 years or older presenting to federally qualified health centers without SARS-CoV-2 infection in the past 90 days. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive 5 COVID-19 ST kits or 5 clinic test referral cards to distribute to contacts in their social network, and testing among their social network contacts was measured. Investigators were masked to study group assignment. Data were analyzed from December 11, 2023, to August 23, 2024. Intervention: Participants in the intervention group received 5 COVID-19 ST kits; control participants received 5 clinic test referral cards. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was confirmed testing among at least 2 network contacts 8 weeks after randomization. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of participants with at least 1 network contact tested and total number of network contacts reached. Results: A total of 776 participants (median [IQR] age, 44 [32-57] years; 428 [55.2%] cisgender female) were included in the study, of whom 388 participants were randomized to the ST intervention group and 388 participants were randomized to the control group. There were 112 Hispanic or Latine participants (14.4%), 459 non-Hispanic Black participants (59.1%), and 120 non-Hispanic White participants (15.5%). There was no difference between study groups in the primary outcome, with 5 participants (1.3%) in the ST group vs 2 participants (0.5%) in the control group having at least 2 contacts confirmed tested at the 8-week follow-up (risk difference, 0.0077; 95% CI -0.0056 to 0.0210; P = .45). Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial found that secondary distribution of COVID-19 ST kits had no effect on confirmed testing rates among network contacts, which were low in both study groups. Despite these null findings, the study provides insight that may be useful when designing and implementing ST trials. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04797858.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 TestingReagent Kits, DiagnosticSelf-TestingAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhiladelphiaSARS-CoV-2Reagent Kits, Diagnostic

Identifiers

PMID40465296
PMCPMC12138724

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.