Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40465299›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2025

An Educational Video Game in Trauma Triage at Nontrauma Centers: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Deepika Mohan, Baruch Fischhoff, Victor Talisa, Jonathan Elmer, Douglas B White, Derek C Angus, Andrew Peitzman, Brad Bendesky, Allyson Cook Chapman, Raquel M Forsythe and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06063434 (Testing the Effectiveness of a Theory-based, Customized Video Game at Increasing the Implementation of Clinical Practice Guidelines in Trauma Triage), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06063434 nacompletednot on this map

Testing the Effectiveness of a Theory-based, Customized Video Game at Increasing the Implementation of Clinical Practice Guidelines in Trauma Triage

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PittsburghRan2023 to 2025Enrolled800ConditionsTrauma Injury, Physician's RoleArmsNight Shift, Usual education
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Deepika MohanDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Baruch FischhoffDepartment of Engineering and Environmental Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Victor TalisaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Jonathan ElmerDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Douglas B WhiteDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Derek C AngusDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Andrew PeitzmanDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Brad BendeskyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Drexel College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Allyson Cook ChapmanDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco.
Raquel M ForsytheDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Frank X GuyetteDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Allyson M HynesDepartment of Surgery, Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
Jonathan J OskvarekUS Acute Care Solutions, Canton, Ohio.
Scott D WeingartEmergency Critical Care, Nassau University Medical Center, East Meadow, New York.
Michael WeinstockDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Adena Health Systems, Chillicothe, Ohio.
Chung-Chou H ChangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Funding

Using video games to increase the implementation of clinical practice guidelines in trauma triageR01AG076499 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Deepika Mohan · 2023 to 2026
$2.3M
Mentored Patient Oriented Research in Improving Surrogate Decision Making for Patients with Advanced Respiratory FailureK24HL148314 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Douglas B White · 2019 to 2026
$944k
Development of a serious game to measure physician implementation of trauma triage guidelinesR21AG081724 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI MOHAN, DEEPIKA · 2023 to 2024
$389k
NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL148314NIA NIH HHS R01 AG076499NIA NIH HHS R21 AG081724
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Understanding how behavioral interventions work and whom they help can increase their effectiveness. Objective: To evaluate the mechanism of action and heterogeneity of the estimated treatment effect of a customized video game (Night Shift) designed to recalibrate physician heuristics (pattern recognition) in trauma triage. Design, Setting, and Participants: This process evaluation of a randomized clinical trial was performed with a national sample of 800 physicians responsible for the triage of patients with trauma at the emergency departments (EDs) of levels III, IV, and V trauma centers and nontrauma centers in the US. Data were collected online from November 27, 2023, to March 11, 2024. Data were analyzed based on intention to treat. Interventions: Usual education or customized video game played for 2 hours. All participants completed a virtual simulation, mimicking 3 ED shifts. Main Measures and Outcomes: The intervention's mechanism of action was analyzed using signal detection theory, which describes decision-making as the product of perceptual sensitivity (the ability to recognize signal [severe injuries] and noise [minor injuries]) and decisional threshold (tolerance for false-positive or false-negative decisions). The heterogeneity of the estimated treatment effect was evaluated using prespecified subgroup analyses to test moderation by participant characteristics (ie, sex, age, and clinical volume). Findings were validated using a data-driven approach with bayesian additive regression trees. Results: The 800 participants (566 [71%] male; mean [SD] age, 43.8 [9.4] years) had mean (SD) professional experience of 12.0 (8.4) years, worked at nontrauma centers (488 [61%]) or at level III, IV, or V trauma centers (312 [39%]), and were board-certified in emergency medicine (673 [84%]). Most intervention participants (339 [85%]) played the customized video game for at least 2 hours or until they completed the content, and most (345 of 398 [87%] for the intervention and 231 of 397 [58%] for the control) used the simulation. Assignment to the intervention arm was associated with a reduction in undertriage (22% vs 38%; percentage point difference, 16 [95% CI, 15-18]; P < .001). The intervention was associated with a moderate increase in tolerance for false-positive decisions (intervention 0.14 SD units [95% CI, 0.07-0.22]; control 0.53 SD units [95% CI, 0.43-0.63]; Cohen d = 0.6) and a small improvement in the ability to recognize severely injured patients (intervention 1.00 SD units [95% CI, 0.94-1.07]; control 0.87 SD units [95% CI, 0.79-0.94]; Cohen d = 0.2). Limited heterogeneity of the estimated treatment effect was observed, although participants' clinical volume was associated with moderation. Conclusions: In this process evaluation of a randomized clinical trial, exposure to a theory-based video game was associated with liberalized thresholds for transfer and limited heterogeneity of the estimated treatment effect. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06063434.

Indexed as

TriageVideo GamesWounds and InjuriesAdultEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTrauma Centers

Identifiers

PMID40465299
PMCPMC12138726

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.