Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40467470›Full record

ArticleApplied clinical informatics2025

The Effect of an EHR Order Set on Cancer Screening Order Rates in Community-Based Health Centers.

Rachel Gold, Constance Owens-Jasey, Jean O'Malley, Rose Gunn, April Lee, Matthew Jones, Michaella Latkovic-Taber, Gordon Barker, Nathalie Huguet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rachel GoldResearch Department, OCHIN Inc., Portland, Oregon, United States.
Constance Owens-JaseyResearch Department, OCHIN Inc., Portland, Oregon, United States.
Jean O'MalleyResearch Department, OCHIN Inc., Portland, Oregon, United States.
Rose GunnResearch Department, OCHIN Inc., Portland, Oregon, United States.
April LeeResearch Department, OCHIN Inc., Portland, Oregon, United States.
Matthew JonesResearch Department, OCHIN Inc., Portland, Oregon, United States.
Michaella Latkovic-TaberResearch Department, OCHIN Inc., Portland, Oregon, United States.
Gordon BarkerResearch Department, OCHIN Inc., Portland, Oregon, United States.
Nathalie HuguetBRIDGE-C2 Implementation Science Center for Cancer Control, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States.

Funding

Research ProgramP50CA244289 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI GOLD, RACHEL · 2019 to 2023
$7.6M
National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health P50CA244289NCI NIH HHS P50 CA244289
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adoption of electronic health record (EHR)-based clinical decision support tools in community-based health centers might increase the provision of indicated cancer screening orders. We examined: (1) if the use of the care gaps smartset (CGS), an EHR tool that expedites ordering care, is associated with colorectal/cervical cancer (CRC/CVC) screening order rates; and (2) how selected implementation strategies, barriers, and facilitators impact CGS use.Within a sequential mixed methods design, we used multivariate regression to assess associations between clinic- and provider-level CGS use and cancer screening order rates. Tool use rates (3/2018-12/2023) were measured as the rate of encounters at which any orders were placed via the CGS and then categorized by use level. Surveys (

Indexed as

Community Health CentersEarly Detection of CancerElectronic Health RecordsColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID40467470
PMCPMC12137202

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.