ArticleBJC reports2025
Cancer prognosis and treatment results in patients with PTEN Hamartoma Tumour Syndrome (PHTS)-a European cohort study.
Article in BJC reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
50 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPTEN hamartoma tumour syndrome (PHTS) patients have a high hereditary risk of cancer, especially breast (BC), endometrial (EC), and thyroid cancer (TC). However, the prognosis of PHTS-related cancers is unknown.
methodsThis European cohort study included adult PHTS patients with data from medical files, registries, and/or questionnaires. Overall survival (OS) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analyses and were compared with sporadic cancer and the general population using standardized mortality (SMR) and relative survival rates (RSR). Survival bias was addressed using left-truncation.
resultsOverall, 147 BC patients were included. The 10y-OS was 77% (95%CI = 66-90), decreasing with increasing stage from 90% (95%CI = 73-100) for stage 0 to 0% (95%CI = 0-0) for stage IV. BC relative survival was comparable to sporadic BC in the first two years (2y-RSR = 1.1; 95%CI = 1.1-1.1) and increasing thereafter (5y-RSR = 1.7; 95%CI = 1.6-1.7). For TC (N = 56) and EC (N = 35), 10y-OS was 87% (95%CI = 74-100) and 64% (95%CI = 38-100), respectively. Overall and cancer-specific mortality in female PHTS patients exceeded general population rates (SMR = 3.7; 95%CI = 2.6-5.0 and SMR = 2.7; 95%CI = 1.6-4.4).
conclusionsThe prognosis of PHTS-related cancers was comparable to the general population. The higher overall mortality in PHTS patients is presumably related to their higher cancer incidence. These findings, and the high survival observed in early-stage cancer, emphasise the importance of recognising PHTS early to facilitate cancer surveillance.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.