Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40468302›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2025

AI-powered segmentation of bifid mandibular canals using CBCT.

Ismail Gumussoy, Kardelen Demirezer, Suayip Burak Duman, Emre Haylaz, Ibrahim Sevki Bayrakdar, Ozer Celik, Ali Zakir Syed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ismail GumussoyDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Sakarya University, Mithatpaşa Mah. Adnan Menderes Cad. No:122/B, Adapazarı, Sakarya, 54100, Turkey.
Kardelen DemirezerDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey.
Suayip Burak DumanDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey.
Emre HaylazDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Sakarya University, Mithatpaşa Mah. Adnan Menderes Cad. No:122/B, Adapazarı, Sakarya, 54100, Turkey. emrehylz03@gmail.com.
Ibrahim Sevki BayrakdarDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Eskişehir, Turkey.
Ozer CelikDepartment of Mathematics-Computer, Faculty of Science, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Eskişehir, Turkey.
Ali Zakir SyedDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, School of Dental Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAccurate segmentation of the mandibular and bifid canals is crucial in dental implant planning to ensure safe implant placement, third molar extractions and other surgical interventions. The objective of this study is to develop and validate an innovative artificial intelligence tool for the efficient, and accurate segmentation of the mandibular and bifid canals on CBCT. MATERIALS AND

methodsCBCT data were screened to identify patients with clearly visible bifid canal variations, and their DICOM files were extracted. These DICOM files were then imported into the 3D Slicer

results69 anonymized CBCT volumes in DICOM format were converted to NIfTI file format. The method, utilizing nnU-Net v2, accurately predicted the voxels associated with the mandibular canal, achieving an intersection of over 50% in nearly all samples. The accuracy, Dice score, precision, and recall scores for the mandibular canal/bifid canal were determined to be 0.99/0.99, 0.82/0.46, 0.85/0.70, and 0.80/0.42, respectively.

conclusionsDespite the bifid canal segmentation not meeting the expected level of success, the findings indicate that the proposed method shows promising and has the potential to be utilized as a supplementary tool for mandibular canal segmentation. Due to the significance of accurately evaluating the mandibular canal before surgery, the use of artificial intelligence could assist in reducing the burden on practitioners by automating the complicated and time-consuming process of tracing and segmenting this structure. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Being able to distinguish bifid channels with artificial intelligence will help prevent neurovascular problems that may occur before or after surgery.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCone-Beam Computed TomographyMandibleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalArtificial intelligenceBifid mandibular canalCone beam computed tomographyMandibular canal

Identifiers

PMID40468302
PMCPMC12139318

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.