ArticleAIDS research and therapy2025
What do women want in pharmacy-based HIV prevention services during pregnancy? Developing attributes and levels for a discrete choice experiment in Western Kenya.
Article in AIDS research and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe delivery of HIV prevention services (e.g., HIV testing, pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) initiation and refills, and STI testing) in community pharmacies could address clinic barriers faced by pregnant women such as extended travel and wait times. We conducted a qualitative study in Western Kenya to select and prioritize attributes and levels for a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to design pharmacy-based HIV prevention services for pregnant women.
methodsWe began by identifying a comprehensive list of attributes and levels relevant to women considering HIV prevention during pregnancy. This list was informed by recommended HIV prevention interventions for pregnant women, our objective to design services for pharmacy settings, and attributes identified in the literature as important for other populations when choosing HIV and pharmacy-based services. From March to November 2022, we recruited participants using stratified purposeful sampling and collected qualitative data through seven focus group discussions with women, four with health providers, and eight individual interviews with technical experts. Interviews were audio-recorded, translated, transcribed, and summarized in debrief reports. We conducted debriefing meetings and analyzed these reports to identify and refine the essential attributes that would influence decisions to access HIV prevention services from a pharmacy during pregnancy.
resultsWe initially identified twelve potential attributes that were evaluated during the focus groups. Five attributes were eliminated based on ranking exercises with women and health providers. Additional attributes suggested during the focus groups were ranked low by participants or not mentioned frequently enough and, therefore, not included. We finalized and refined levels for each attribute using insights from the literature, participant feedback, and design considerations. The study identified seven attributes: service location, type of HIV test, STI testing availability, partner HIV testing availability, PrEP availability, service access methods (e.g., appointment versus walk-ins), and service fee.
conclusionsThis study was the first step in data collection toward defining attributes and levels for a DCE survey and successfully identified seven preliminary attributes and levels. Pre-testing and pilot testing activities further explored the feasibility and understanding of the attributes and levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.