Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40468411›Full record

ArticleJournal of health, population, and nutrition2025

Caregiver burden in family caregivers of individuals with cancer in Iran: an analytical cross-sectional study.

Arvin Mirshahi, Zahra Farsi, Seyedeh Azam Sajadi, Fatemeh Pakdin, Ali Faridfar, Arsia Taghva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health, population, and nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Arvin MirshahiResearch Center on Caring Sciences in Crisis, School of Nursing, Cancer Epidemiology Research Center, Aja University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-8537-1817
Zahra FarsiCancer Epidemiology Research Center, Research Center on Caring Sciences in Crisis, School of Nursing, Aja University of Medical Sciences, Kaj St., Shariati St., Tehran, Iran. zahrafarsi2021@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5154-0758
Seyedeh Azam SajadiNursing Management Department, Research Center on Caring Sciences in Crisis, School of Nursing, Aja University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Fatemeh PakdinEmergency Nursing Department, Research Center on Caring Sciences in Crisis, School of Nursing, Aja University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0009-0004-6820-0516
Ali FaridfarAJA Cancer Epidemiology Research and Treatment Center (AJA-CERTC), Aja University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Arsia TaghvaDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Aja University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer is a leading cause of mortality worldwide, with an increasing burden. Family caregivers, primarily family members, play a vital role in supporting individuals with cancer but frequently experience significant caregiver burden. This study aimed to identify and analyze the key predictors of caregiver burden among Iranian family caregivers of individuals with cancer.

methodsThis cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted at Imam Reza Hospital in Tehran, Iran, in 2024. We recruited a convenience sample of 307 family caregivers of individuals with cancer. Eligibility criteria included being aged 18 years or older, providing unpaid care, and willingness to participate. In addition to caregiver-related data, patient-related data were also collected to provide a comprehensive understanding of the caregiving context. Data collection tools included an individual characteristics questionnaire, the Barthel Index to assess patient dependency, and the Caregiver Burden Inventory (CBI) to measure caregiver burden. Barthel Index and CBI questionnaire was completed by caregivers based on their observations of the patient. Descriptive statistics, Independent t-tests, One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and multivariate regression analysis were used to analyze the data using SPSS version 22.

resultsMost caregivers were female (74.3%) with a mean age of 43.19 ± 11.60 years, and 50.5% were unemployed. Among patients, 62.2% were female with a mean age of 56.49 ± 14.27 years. Gynecological (36.8%) and gastrointestinal (32.2%) cancers were most common. Caregivers providing over 12 h of care daily reported significantly higher burden scores compared to those who provided less than 12 h of care (P < 0.001). Caregivers with poor health or insufficient income also had higher burden scores (P = 0.016 and P = 0.011, respectively). Child/parent caregivers had higher burden scores than spouses (P = 0.023). Multivariate regression identified caregiving hours (β = - 5.553, SE = 2.231, P = 0.010 for < 6 h; β = - 5.571, SE = 1.946, P = 0.004 for 6-12 h vs. > 12 h), increased patient dependency (β = - 0.353, SE = 0.035, P < 0.001), and the absence of metastasis (β = - 4.680, SE = 1.946, P = 0.017) as key predictors of burden. Together, these variables explained 35.2% of the variance in caregiver burden (Adjusted R

conclusionCaregiving hours, patient dependency, health, and financial strain are significant predictors of caregiver burden. Respite care services and financial support are critical to alleviate this burden. Future research should focus on longitudinal impacts and culturally tailored interventions to better support caregivers.

Indexed as

Caregiver BurdenCaregiversCost of IllnessFamilyNeoplasmsAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIranMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesCancerCancer caregiversCaregiver burdenCaregiversFamily caregiversNeoplasmsPatient dependency

Identifiers

PMID40468411
PMCPMC12139334

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.